2014
DOI: 10.1216/rmj-2014-44-3-809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A descent homomorphism for semimultiplicative sets

Abstract: We define and provide some basic analysis of various types of crossed products by semimultiplicative sets, and then prove a KK-theoretical descent homomorphisms for semimultiplicative sets in accord with the descent homomorphism for discrete groups.definition of equivariant KK-theory for inversely generated semigroups. In Section 9 we compare semimultiplicative set G-equivariant KK-theory with Kasparov's G-equivariant KK-theory when G is a group. Sections 11-13 occupy the proof of the descent homomorphism, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin by recalling crossed products in the sense of Khoshkam and Skandalis [11] and Sieben [19], but use several notions from [6]. Let G denote an inverse semigroup.…”
Section: Preparing Definitions and Crossed Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin by recalling crossed products in the sense of Khoshkam and Skandalis [11] and Sieben [19], but use several notions from [6]. Let G denote an inverse semigroup.…”
Section: Preparing Definitions and Crossed Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference for group equivariant KK-theory is Kasparov [12], for groupoid equivariant KK-theory it is Le Gall [13], and for inverse semigroup equivariant KK-theory it is [3], or see [2] for a summary of the definitions. (We use the slightly adapted 'compatible' version of equivariant KK-theory as in [2].)…”
Section: The Universal Property Of Kk G For Groupoids Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skandalis' proof is non-equivariant, but it works also equivariant, see for example [3] for inverse semigroups G.…”
Section: Preparation For Pushout Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this note, we shall however require none of them. We consider G-equivariant KK-theory as defined in [3] but make a slight adaption by making this theory compatible in the sense that we only allow for compatible Hilbert (bi)modules (cf. Definition 2.2).…”
Section: The Busby-invariant In the Equivariant Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists an associative Kasparov product in KK G as usual (see [3]). We list here some notions from [11].…”
Section: The Busby-invariant In the Equivariant Casementioning
confidence: 99%