2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A density-functional study on the atomic geometry and adsorption of the Cu(100) c(2×2)/N Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculated value for the relaxation of the first and second layers with respect to the bulk Cu (d 12 ) of (-1.56%) corresponding to a small reduction comparative to bulk. This value is lower than previous DFT-GGA calculations 19,40 and lower than the experimental data 41 . Also, our predicted relaxation of the second and third layers with respect to the bulk Cu (d 23 ) of (+1.02%) is higher than the experimental value of (+0.5%), 41,42 and are in a good agreement with previous DFT-GGA calculations (+1%) 19 and (+0.9%).…”
Section: Analysis Of Clean Cu(100) Surfacecontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our calculated value for the relaxation of the first and second layers with respect to the bulk Cu (d 12 ) of (-1.56%) corresponding to a small reduction comparative to bulk. This value is lower than previous DFT-GGA calculations 19,40 and lower than the experimental data 41 . Also, our predicted relaxation of the second and third layers with respect to the bulk Cu (d 23 ) of (+1.02%) is higher than the experimental value of (+0.5%), 41,42 and are in a good agreement with previous DFT-GGA calculations (+1%) 19 and (+0.9%).…”
Section: Analysis Of Clean Cu(100) Surfacecontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Also, our predicted relaxation of the second and third layers with respect to the bulk Cu (d 23 ) of (+1.02%) is higher than the experimental value of (+0.5%), 41,42 and are in a good agreement with previous DFT-GGA calculations (+1%) 19 and (+0.9%). 40 For Cu (100) surface, there are three possible sites for gas adsorption, outlined as T (top site on the upper Cu atom), H (Hollow site between four top Cu atoms) and B (bridge site between two top Cu atoms) as noted in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Analysis Of Clean Cu(100) Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations, the surface state model is usually used to describe the friction charge state, which can be investigated by the work function test and theory analysis. [42][43][44] For example, when the electron-occupied surface state of dielectric A was higher than the electron-unoccupied surface state of dielectric B, electron transfer occurred aer they came into contact with each other, wherein electrons were transferred from A to B, as shown in Fig. 8b.…”
Section: Surface Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations, the surface state model is usually used to describe the friction charge state, which can be investigated by the work function test and theory analysis. 42–44…”
Section: Influencing Factors Of Tribocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic relaxations of Pt (111) surface in this work are agree well with all the existing calculations and experiments both quantitatively and qualitatively. By the way, the surface expansion of Pt (111) surface is in contrast to Cu (111), Ag (111), and Ni (111) surface [30], which relax slightly inwards [31] and where the Mulliken charge is slightly positive in the outermost layer [28]. The surface energy of Pt (111) surface is obtained from the total-energy calculations of bulk platinum and the relaxed Pt (111) surface.…”
Section: Calculated Properties Of Clean Pt (111) Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%