2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A density-based cluster validity approach using multi-representatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
67
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, the CDbw clustering validity index which allows to incorporate inter-cluster and intra-cluster density information is used in conjunction with two spatial information measures to determine which cluster pair to be merged. Although the CDbw index has a reasonable computational complexity in comparison with others clustering validity indexes (Halkidi & Vazirgiannis, 2002), the local use of it to decide about the cluster fusion added to the large data volume that normally arises from remote sensing images may require a considerable processing time for clustering the SOM. For this reason, seeking to reduce the processing volume, instead of calculating the CDbw index directly on image original data the method proposed here performs the calculation of it using the own SOM prototype vectors (which represent the image original data).…”
Section: Hierarchical Clustering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, the CDbw clustering validity index which allows to incorporate inter-cluster and intra-cluster density information is used in conjunction with two spatial information measures to determine which cluster pair to be merged. Although the CDbw index has a reasonable computational complexity in comparison with others clustering validity indexes (Halkidi & Vazirgiannis, 2002), the local use of it to decide about the cluster fusion added to the large data volume that normally arises from remote sensing images may require a considerable processing time for clustering the SOM. For this reason, seeking to reduce the processing volume, instead of calculating the CDbw index directly on image original data the method proposed here performs the calculation of it using the own SOM prototype vectors (which represent the image original data).…”
Section: Hierarchical Clustering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeking to overcome the limitations of these approaches, Wu & Chow (2004) proposed then a hierarchical algorithm for clustering the SOM that uses more information about the data in each cluster in addition to inter-cluster distances. To determine which pair of clusters to be merged the proposed algorithm locally uses the CDbw clustering validity index (Composing Density Between and Within Clusters), presented in Halkidi & Vazirgiannis (2002), which allows to incorporate the inter-cluster and intra-cluster density into merging criteria in addition to distance information. Wu and Chow showed that the algorithm proposed by them clusters data better than the classical clustering algorithms on the SOM.…”
Section: Second Level Clustering -Segmentation Of the Sommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved version of Clustering Using Representative is proposed in [17] to pick different numbers of representatives for a variety of clusters based on cluster density. A multi-representative approach based on density is planned in [18]. In the fuzzy clustering approach called fuzzy clustering with weighted prototype [19], every cluster is characterized by a variety of weighted medoids.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fuzzy clustering approach called fuzzy clustering with weighted prototype [19], every cluster is characterized by a variety of weighted medoids. Unlike from other multi representatives based methods [16] [18]. Where representatives of every cluster are choose to be a prespecified variety with equal weights, in Partitional Fuzzy Clustering, the weights as well as the variety of representative objects in every cluster are determined based on the nature of the dataset.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar do sucesso dos processos de agrupamento de dados, considera-se que resultados satisfatórios, a partir do ponto de vista de um determinado usuário, só serão atingidos se for possível avaliar o comportamento, importância ou influência dos dados e atributos nos resultados obtidos, bem como entender se os grupos são similares ou não similares (HALKIDI;VAZIRGIANNIS, 2002). Assim, desenvolvemos uma metodologia que possibilita a aplicação da metáfora compacta apresentada anteriormente na análise de agrupamentos.…”
Section: Analisando Agrupamentosunclassified