2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dendrochronological evaluation of three historic pioneer cabins at Spring Mill Village, Indiana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another benefit of the improved network will be the use of archaeological material in climatological and ecological research. Dendroarchaeological data have the potential to extend existing chronologies farther into the past (Cook et al, 2015; Matheus et al, 2017), informing a broader context of environmental change (e.g., in the development of drought atlases). Other potential advances include analyses of range-wide crossdating and climate sensitivity of longleaf pine.…”
Section: Primary Applications In Dendrochronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another benefit of the improved network will be the use of archaeological material in climatological and ecological research. Dendroarchaeological data have the potential to extend existing chronologies farther into the past (Cook et al, 2015; Matheus et al, 2017), informing a broader context of environmental change (e.g., in the development of drought atlases). Other potential advances include analyses of range-wide crossdating and climate sensitivity of longleaf pine.…”
Section: Primary Applications In Dendrochronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…less commonly used species can increase the representativeness of tree-ring reconstructions of climate (Pederson et al, 2012;Maxwell, 2016;Maxwell and Harley, 2017;Alexander et al, 2019).…”
Section: Species Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rejection of prospective crossmatches that contain low-matching segments is not hard-and-fast, as it is not unusual for a tree to go through decades of suboptimal response to the annual climatic signal. In fact, depending upon the judgment of the individual dendrochronologist, prospective crossmatches with even multiple low-matching segments can still be accepted as correct (e, g., Matheus 2017). The foregoing extends to low-matchingsegment-containing series against the master chronology, which is further aggravated whenever the sample depth* is relatively low, and there is insufficient common variance to "iron out" some of the "misbehaving" segments.…”
Section: The Internals Of Valid Crossmatches: the Block Testmentioning
confidence: 99%