Abstract:These findings reflect a higher XR-NTX cessation rate and a lower average number of doses, in contrast to similar demonstration projects in community settings with patients on parole or probation. However, this study shows that it is feasible to engage treatment providers in the use XR-NTX among their patients with alcohol or opioid use disorders. Several implications for future research and implementation are discussed.
“…Participants coming from longer-term detoxification programs (mean duration = 35.1 days, SD = 27.5) were substantially more likely to be inducted on XR-NTX compared to participants coming from shorter-term detoxification programs (mean duration = 7.0 days, SD = 4.9). This finding is consistent with observational data collected in an XR-NTX implementation study in Los Angeles, CA that found patients receiving XR-NTX were significantly more likely to have been referred from residential treatment (47.5% vs. 16.5%) and less likely to have been referred from outpatient treatment (32.5% vs. 67.5%) than patients who did not receive XR-NTX (Cousins, et al, 2016).…”
Our analyses suggest that individuals recently leaving longer-term opioid detoxification programs are more likely to complete XR-NTX induction. Individuals on parole or probation are less likely to complete XR-NTX induction and may need additional supports or modifications to induction procedures to be successful.
“…Participants coming from longer-term detoxification programs (mean duration = 35.1 days, SD = 27.5) were substantially more likely to be inducted on XR-NTX compared to participants coming from shorter-term detoxification programs (mean duration = 7.0 days, SD = 4.9). This finding is consistent with observational data collected in an XR-NTX implementation study in Los Angeles, CA that found patients receiving XR-NTX were significantly more likely to have been referred from residential treatment (47.5% vs. 16.5%) and less likely to have been referred from outpatient treatment (32.5% vs. 67.5%) than patients who did not receive XR-NTX (Cousins, et al, 2016).…”
Our analyses suggest that individuals recently leaving longer-term opioid detoxification programs are more likely to complete XR-NTX induction. Individuals on parole or probation are less likely to complete XR-NTX induction and may need additional supports or modifications to induction procedures to be successful.
“…Similar to the preceding RCT phase and other XR‐NTX studies , the majority of the adverse events were withdrawal‐related and reported following the first administration of XR‐NTX . While we administered the first XR‐NTX injection after a minimum 72 hours of complete abstinence from any opioids, other studies have recommended a longer period of abstinence . Extending the number of opioid‐free days would have reduced the amount of adverse events and eased the induction phase.…”
Opioid-dependent individuals who elect to switch from buprenorphine-naltrexone treatment after 3 months to extended-release naltrexone treatment for 9 months appear to experience similar treatment completion and abstinence rates and similar adverse event profiles to individuals who had been on extended-release naltrexone from the start of treatment.
“…This long‐acting formulation can be given in a wide range of clinical settings, including primary care and criminal justice systems 13, 14. However, there is limited experience with this drug medication outside specialized treatment settings.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.