2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3823-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Delphi study to develop indicators of cancer patient experience for quality improvement

Abstract: Experts identified priorities with a high level of consensus, providing a rigorous foundation for developing prioritised indicators of quality in cancer patient experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the differences identi ed, these efforts are compromised by not containing items that assess aspects of care that may be key drivers of engagement with care for Indigenous people. This suggests the need for deeper enquiry to ensure that patient experience measures re ect what is important to cancer patients (7,8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the differences identi ed, these efforts are compromised by not containing items that assess aspects of care that may be key drivers of engagement with care for Indigenous people. This suggests the need for deeper enquiry to ensure that patient experience measures re ect what is important to cancer patients (7,8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Continuity and transition') (28), thematic areas (e.g. 'information provision') (7,29), or stage in the cancer pathway (e.g. 'Finding out what was wrong') (30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21 Expert opinion has also been solicited in an attempt to identify components of patient experience thought to be most important to medical oncology patients. 22 Only one study has aimed to improve patient satisfaction in the subspecialty of pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO). 23 Although improvement in patient experience was demonstrated, the key drivers most associated with favorable physician and practice ratings were not elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%