2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-008-9075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Delay-Dependent Approach to Robust H ∞ Control for Uncertain Stochastic Systems with State and Input Delays

Abstract: In this paper, the problem of delay-dependent robust H ∞ control for uncertain stochastic systems with state and input delays is investigated. The time delays are assumed to be bounded and time varying and the uncertainties are assumed to be norm bounded. By using the Lyapunov functional method, a new delay-dependent robust H ∞ control scheme is presented in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs).Some numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our aim is to calculate the maximum allowable time delay h M , such that the system can be stabilized with disturbance attenuation level γ . In Table 3, our results on the maximum allowed delay h M for a given γ are compared with the results in Li et al 22 From Table 3, it can be shown that our results give larger delay bounds than the one in Li et al 22…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our aim is to calculate the maximum allowable time delay h M , such that the system can be stabilized with disturbance attenuation level γ . In Table 3, our results on the maximum allowed delay h M for a given γ are compared with the results in Li et al 22 From Table 3, it can be shown that our results give larger delay bounds than the one in Li et al 22…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our aim is to calculate the maximum allowable time delay h M , such that the system can be stabilized with disturbance attenuation level g. In Table 3, our results on the maximum allowed delay h M for a given g are compared with the results in Li et al 22 From Table 3, it can be shown that our results give larger delay bounds than the one in Li et al 22 Case 2. Now, suppose B 1 = DB 1 (t) = E = E 1 = C 1 = D 1 = 0, the system becomes the one in Chen et al 21 To compare our results on the maximum allowable time delay h M for different given g with those in Chen et al 21 and Li et al 22 Tables 4 and 5 give the comparison results. Note that the proposed method in this article provides an H ' controller achieving much smaller g for much bigger h M , which implies that the proposed method is much less conservative than the existing results.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, only active suspension linear systems with actuator faults are considered along with the development of a novel fault-tolerant controller design algorithm for the systems. If both unmodelled dynamics and parametric uncertainties (mass, damping coefficient, stiffness) are considered in this paper, then it is possible to deduce that the control design process will contain both parametric uncertainties, which can be modelled by normbounded uncertainties [46][47][48] or polytopic type uncertainties [3,49]. For uncertain active suspension systems with actuator faults, the fault-tolerant controller design results are also derived by using the methods proposed in this paper and the authors' previous papers [3,[46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%