2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A degeneration-reducing criterion for optimal digital mapping of genetic codes

Abstract: Bioinformatics may seem to be a scientific field processing primarily large string datasets, as nucleotides and amino acids are represented with dedicated characters. On the other hand, many computational tasks that bioinformatics challenges are mathematical problems understandable as operations with digits. In fact, many computational tasks are solved this way in the background. One of the most widely used digital representations is mapping of nucleotides and amino acids with integers 0–3 and 0–20, respective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation criteria of all recurrent neural networks were defined as accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and AUC scores. The calculation formula of these metrics can be seen in [32,39,40]. Classification of protein families was performed with four different application scenarios.…”
Section: Application Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluation criteria of all recurrent neural networks were defined as accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and AUC scores. The calculation formula of these metrics can be seen in [32,39,40]. Classification of protein families was performed with four different application scenarios.…”
Section: Application Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, considering all the results, EIIP, and hydrophobicity method cannot be said to very successful. The reason for this may be that these methods have become degenerated [20,39], since different amino acids can be mapped to same numbers (Q, and N in hydrophobicity, I, and L in EIIP). Further, the performance of the random encoded method depends on the number generated.…”
Section: The Performance Comparison By Using the Blstmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading frames were validated by the presence of a starting codon on the 5′-end and a STOP codon on the 3′. The mitochondrial codons were translated based on taxon-specific mitochondrial translation tables (see NCBI Genetic Codes) 82 . In some organisms, the STOP codon was missing from certain mtDNA encoded sequences, as it is known to be added post-transcriptionally 83 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%