2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Definitive Prognostication System for Patients With Thoracic Malignancies Diagnosed With Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Update From the TERAVOLT Registry

Abstract: Background Patients with thoracic malignancies are at increased risk for mortality from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and large number of intertwined prognostic variables have been identified so far. Methods Capitalizing data from the TERAVOLT registry, a global study created with the aim of describing the impact of COVID-19 in patients with thoracic malignancies, we used a clustering approach, a fast-backward step-down selection procedure and a tree-based model t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this analysis of the fourth COVID-19 wave, overall mortality of patients with thoracic malignancies in the TERAVOLT database was notably lower at 3.2% compared with 24.2% to 33% in prior surges. 1,2 This improvement in mortality is similar to that reported for the general population, with an analysis of patients hospitalized in South Africa with COVID-19 revealing a mortality of 2.7% in wave 4 compared with 19.7% in wave 1 (ancestral variant) and 29.1% in wave 3 (delta). 5 Our analysis reveals the importance of a booster vaccination to achieve the maximum protective effect from severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization or death (relative risk ¼ 0.30) in patients with thoracic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this analysis of the fourth COVID-19 wave, overall mortality of patients with thoracic malignancies in the TERAVOLT database was notably lower at 3.2% compared with 24.2% to 33% in prior surges. 1,2 This improvement in mortality is similar to that reported for the general population, with an analysis of patients hospitalized in South Africa with COVID-19 revealing a mortality of 2.7% in wave 4 compared with 19.7% in wave 1 (ancestral variant) and 29.1% in wave 3 (delta). 5 Our analysis reveals the importance of a booster vaccination to achieve the maximum protective effect from severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization or death (relative risk ¼ 0.30) in patients with thoracic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Prior analysis of mortality was 24.2% to 33%. 1,2 The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.529 (Omicron) variant was classified as a Variant of Concern by the WHO in November 2021. 3 Omicron was found to have the ability to evade existing SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with thoracic malignancies are at a high risk of mortality. 1 To prevent nosocomial transmission among patients and healthcare providers, visits, examinations, and procedures were restricted during the pandemic, and many focused efforts were underway, including pre-screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) before hospitalization. The increase in the number of COVID-19 patients shifted the functioning of hospitals from general practice to COVID-19 care and decreased the availability of intensive care units (ICU) for surgeries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, it should be taken into consideration that, mainly during the first pandemic waves, patients with cancer might not had equivalent access to ICU, a setting which is associated with increased risk of thrombosis (100). Interestingly, a recent study defining prognostic factors in patients with COVID-19 and thoracic malignancies did not identify coagulation-related factors as determinants of worse prognosis (101). Finally, it should be noted that the thrombotic and bleeding risks are heterogeneous across cancer sites, stages, or treatment and that the published cohorts, which in general include any cancer history, might not permit the estimation of the risk in a well-characterized population of patients with pro-thrombotic cancer types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%