A Definition of Significant Instability and a Scoring System for Predicting Meniscal Tears in ACL-Deficient Knees

Abstract

Background: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient knees risk recurrent instability of the affected knee, which may predispose to meniscal injuries. Various studies have correlated the incidence of meniscal tear with elapsed time from ACL tear and number of instability events. However, it is not clear how significant an instability event needs to be to contribute to a meniscal tear. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to (1) define a significant instability episode and (2) develop a checklist and scoring system for predicting meniscal tears based on significant instability episode. We hypothesized that patients with ACL-deficient knees who met the scoring threshold for a significant instability episode would have a higher incidence of meniscal tears compared with those who did not meet the threshold. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–confirmed isolated ACL tear for longer than 3 months. We determined parameters for assessing instability episodes and defined any instability events between the MRI and ACL reconstruction as significant or insignificant. Patients were then grouped into a significant instability group (≥1 significant episode) and an insignificant instability group, and the incidence and types of meniscal tears found during surgery were compared between groups. Results: There were 108 study patients: 62 in the significant instability group and 46 in the insignificant instability group. During surgery, 58 meniscal tears (46 medial, 12 lateral) were recorded, for an overall meniscal injury rate of 53.70%. In the significant instability group, 47 patients (75.81%) had a meniscal tear and 15 (24.19%) had intact menisci ( P < .001). In the insignificant instability group, 11 patients (23.91%) had a meniscal tear and 35 (76.08%) had intact menisci ( P < .001). Regarding the 58 patients with a meniscal tear, 47 (81.03%) had ≥1 significant episode of instability before surgery, as compared with 11 (18.97%) who had insignificant or no instability. The odds of having a medial meniscal tear at ACL reconstruction was 10 times higher in the significant instability group versus the insignificant instability group. Conclusion: The incidence of a medial meniscal tear was 10 times greater in patients with a significant episode of instability versus those with insignificant instability, as defined using a predictive scoring system. The incidence of lateral meniscal tear did not change with instability episodes.

Epidemiological profile of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a tertiary referral trauma center of Nepal

“…Non-sports-related causes (RTA, fall, and others) constituted most ACL injuries (66.7%) in our study. Similar to our result, previous research [ 11 ] evaluating meniscal injury in patients with an ACL tear and another paper from Nepal [ 12 ] evaluating the outcome of single-bundle ACLR also mentioned RTA being the most common cause of ACL injury. However, those studies did not elaborate on the several epidemiological aspects of ACL injury and focused primarily on the incidence of meniscal injury.…”