2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deficit of ultraluminous X-ray sources in luminous infrared galaxies

Abstract: Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.P… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(195 reference statements)
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier Chandra study, we found a deficiency of ultra-luminous X-ray point sources (ULXs; L X > 10 39 erg s −1 ) relative to L FIR for ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) . This deficiency in ULXs in high SFR galaxies was later confirmed by Luangtip et al (2015). In the current study, we investigate whether there is a corresponding depression in the diffuse X-ray luminosity relative to the SFR at high L FIR , or if the global deficiency is due to point sources alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In an earlier Chandra study, we found a deficiency of ultra-luminous X-ray point sources (ULXs; L X > 10 39 erg s −1 ) relative to L FIR for ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) . This deficiency in ULXs in high SFR galaxies was later confirmed by Luangtip et al (2015). In the current study, we investigate whether there is a corresponding depression in the diffuse X-ray luminosity relative to the SFR at high L FIR , or if the global deficiency is due to point sources alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Gilfanov et al 2004, Luangtip et al 2014 continues to this day as new observations arise, and the balance has tipped recently in favour of stellar-mass BHs and NSs (M101 ULX-1, Liu et al 2013;NGC7793 P13, Motch et al 2014;M-82 X-2, Bachetti et al 2014) rather than IMBHs. It is actually interesting that the observations do not favour the "simpler" resolution of this issue: the main difficulty with ULXs is that they should not radiate above the Eddington limit (L Edd = 1.3 × 10 38 (MX /M ) erg s −1 ), and IMBHs with masses MX ∼10 2−4 M would remain comfortably below this limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen by comparing Figure 2 We estimate the flux of each 3σ-detected source assuming a power law with a photon index of Γ = 1.7 (Swartz et al 2004;Soria 2011). Their luminosities (Table 1) put them in the range of ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs; commonly associated with star forming galaxies Swartz et al 2011;Luangtip Figure 2. (a) Extraction regions for both bright point-like sources W1-3, E1-5, and B1 associated with the southwestern galaxy UGC 12914, northeastern galaxy UGC 12915, and the bridge region, respectively; and the extended regions extracted (see Table 1).…”
Section: The Compact Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%