2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03949-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Defeasible Logic Programming-Based Framework to Support Argumentation in Semantic Web Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of Semantic Web tools for collaboration activities addressed some of the challenges such as information has meaning attached to it that makes it understandable across enterprise boundaries and facilitates data sharing and integration [14]. Additionally, platforms such as D2RQ enable applications to access an RDF-view of the underlying structured data i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of Semantic Web tools for collaboration activities addressed some of the challenges such as information has meaning attached to it that makes it understandable across enterprise boundaries and facilitates data sharing and integration [14]. Additionally, platforms such as D2RQ enable applications to access an RDF-view of the underlying structured data i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representing knowledge in the form of ontologies has several advantages such as knowledge sharing, knowledge reuse and it helps in building automated systems using logic-based reasoning [14]. Semantic annotation is a process which makes use of one or several ontologies to tag the unstructured information.…”
Section: Semantic Annotation Of Unstructured Information Using Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A defeasible logic program has the form ψ= (Π, Δ), where Π and Δ stand for strict knowledge and defeasible knowledge, respectively. We extended DeLP for knowledge representation and reasoning in semantic web application [8].…”
Section: Planning Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [8], we proposed a framework for incomplete and conflicting information representation and developed argumentation-based algorithms for reasoning over such information in Semantic Web applications. In this paper, we extend our previous work and apply it in the area of logistics and supply chain where planning for operational risk may need to be addressed at a spoke by considering the information from other multiple global and region specific locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%