2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep learning reconstruction framework for X-ray computed tomography with incomplete data

Abstract: As a powerful imaging tool, X-ray computed tomography (CT) allows us to investigate the inner structures of specimens in a quantitative and nondestructive way. Limited by the implementation conditions, CT with incomplete projections happens quite often. Conventional reconstruction algorithms are not easy to deal with incomplete data. They are usually involved with complicated parameter selection operations, also sensitive to noise and time-consuming. In this paper, we reported a deep learning reconstruction fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, most of the methods in the reviewed literature implement direct image translation from low-dose to full-dose CT while others restore the sinogram using deep learning first, and then reconstruct images from the restored sinogram by FBP. As shown byDong et al, their proposed projection-based method outperformed an image-based method by better reducing downsampling artifacts with higher resolution on object edges 119. A potential reason for this difference is that for image-based methods prediction error is directly observed on the image while for projection-based methods, the error predicted on the sinogram will be compensated for in the reconstruction process, where the final product is a weighted sum of all sinograms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, most of the methods in the reviewed literature implement direct image translation from low-dose to full-dose CT while others restore the sinogram using deep learning first, and then reconstruct images from the restored sinogram by FBP. As shown byDong et al, their proposed projection-based method outperformed an image-based method by better reducing downsampling artifacts with higher resolution on object edges 119. A potential reason for this difference is that for image-based methods prediction error is directly observed on the image while for projection-based methods, the error predicted on the sinogram will be compensated for in the reconstruction process, where the final product is a weighted sum of all sinograms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reconstructions. More recently, a new deep learning reconstruction framework for CT with incomplete projections utilized tight coupling of the deep learning U-net and FBP algorithm in the domain of the projection sinograms [29]. Indeed, DL methods described have shown tremendous potential in reducing the number of views and retaining excellent reconstruction ability [39,48,85].…”
Section: Limited View Reconstruction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned networks can also be adapted for other types of inputs and outputs. Some studies on limited angle tomography, for example, choose to perform image restoration in sinogram space ( ) prior to image reconstruction [ 77 , 78 ], although both options are compared for partial-ring PET in [ 79 ], showing better results using image space data. Alternatively, dual imaging modalities such as PET/MRI may use the MRI scan as an additional input to provide anatomical information, helping with the denoising of the PET scan [ 80 ].…”
Section: Medical Image Acquisition and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%