2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02894-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep learning radiomics model may help to improve the prediction performance of preoperative grading in meningioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Some studies have reported prediction of grading, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of meningiomas using radiomic signatures (e.g., T1C, T2, DWI, T1WI, T1C, and ADC mapping). 8,[26][27][28] Hence, we explored the radiomic signatures associated with meningioma sinus invasion. The model based on 20 signatures had the highest AUC for the training and validation cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Some studies have reported prediction of grading, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of meningiomas using radiomic signatures (e.g., T1C, T2, DWI, T1WI, T1C, and ADC mapping). 8,[26][27][28] Hence, we explored the radiomic signatures associated with meningioma sinus invasion. The model based on 20 signatures had the highest AUC for the training and validation cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through various ML algorithms applied to RA, we finally extracted two sets of 20 Ki-67- and p53-related features from each patient, which consisted of the first-order features adding more advanced high-order features. The entropy belongs to the GLCM feature pool reflecting the intensity of the spatial distribution, which means that the larger entropy value represents a greater tumor heterogeneity ( 25 ). Regarding the uniformity of the tumor texture of the GLSZM, high-grade meningiomas are featured by a larger proportion of tissue disruption, and thus a higher heterogeneity of the distribution of cells in the tumor lesions compared with low-grade lesions ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also demonstrated a superior deep learning performance over typical, hand-crafted features. A further enhanced T1-weighted image-based deep learning model was used by Yang et al [ 22 ] in differentiating low- and high-grade meningiomas. In their study, the combined deep learning–radiomics model outperformed both the deep learning and hand-crafted radiomics models working alone (test AUC: 0.935 vs. 0.918 vs. 0.718).…”
Section: Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%