“…Prior to the training of prostate adenocarcinoma model using TUR-P WSIs, we have demonstrated the existing adenocarcinoma classification models AUC performances on TUR-P test sets (Table 2). Existing adenocarcinoma classification models were summarized in Table 3: (1) breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) classification model (Breast IDC (x10, 512)) Kanavati and Tsuneki (2021a), (2) breast invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) classification model (Breast IDC, DCIS (x10, 224)) Kanavati et al (2022), (3) colon adenocarcinoma (ADC) and adenoma (AD) classification model (Colon ADC, AD (x10, 512)) Iizuka et al (2020), (4) colon poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma classification model (transfer learning model from stomach poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma classification model) (Colon poorly ADC-1 (x20, 512)) Tsuneki and Kanavati (2021), (5) colon poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma classification model (EfficientNetB1 trained model) (Colon poorly ADC-2 (x20, 512)) Tsuneki and Kanavati (2021), (6) stomach adenocarcinoma and adenoma classification model (Stomach ADC, AD (x10, 512)) Iizuka et al (2020), (7) stomach poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma classification model (Stomach poorly ADC (x20, 224)) Kanavati and Tsuneki (2021b), (8) stomach signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) classification model (Stomach SRCC (x10, 224)) Kanavati et al (2021a), (9) pancreas endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy adenocarcinoma classification model (Pancreas EUS-FNA ADC (x10, 224)) Naito et al (2021), and (10) lung carcinoma classification model (Lung Carcinoma (x10, 512)) Kanavati et al (2020). Table 3 shows that Colon poorly ADC-2 (x20, 512) and Lung Carcinoma (x10, 512) models exhibited both high ROC-AUC and low log loss values as compared to other models.…”