2022
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.12.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning Framework for the Detection and Quantification of Reticular Pseudodrusen and Drusen on Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) framework for the detection and quantification of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) and drusen on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Methods A DL framework was developed consisting of a classification model and an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection model for the identification of ungradable scans; a classification model to identify scans with drusen or RPD; and an image segmentation mo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate both of the intra- and inter-reader reproducibility for VOI measurements for the present study, the reproducibility error was assessed by calculating the root mean square average of the single coefficients of variation on a percentage basis, as previously reported [ 20 ]. The inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using standard guidelines [ 21 ]. ICC values below 0.50 were considered poor, values 0.50–0.75 moderate, values 0.75–0.90 good, and values above 0.90 excellent [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate both of the intra- and inter-reader reproducibility for VOI measurements for the present study, the reproducibility error was assessed by calculating the root mean square average of the single coefficients of variation on a percentage basis, as previously reported [ 20 ]. The inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using standard guidelines [ 21 ]. ICC values below 0.50 were considered poor, values 0.50–0.75 moderate, values 0.75–0.90 good, and values above 0.90 excellent [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, determining the presence of RPD assessed by multimodal imaging in patients with AMD is important if we are to fully understand the factors that drive disease progression. Further research that assesses the extent of RPD (e.g., by volume and/or area) could assist in establishing a more quantitative relationship between RPD and progression from iAMD to late AMD, and algorithms are being developed to help with this task [ 49 ].…”
Section: Structural Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OptinNet deep learning model has been trained to identify “points of interest” in SD-OCT scans of patients with AMD; it classified drusen, RPE, retinal nerve fiber, and choroidal layers as of interest in 337 scans of 62 eyes with AMD [ 169 ]. Deep learning has also been employed to detect RPD from OCT scans; agreement with human graders was 0.6, versus 0.68 agreement between two human graders [ 49 ].…”
Section: Structural Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proposed network slightly enhanced the performance obtained using FAF images only with AUC of 0.933. 7 To our knowledge, only Schwartz et al 8 have attempted to detect both RPD and conventional drusen from OCT scans, where their model achieved AUC of 0.99. However, they detected the presence of RPD or drusen without distinguishing between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%