2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32248-9_84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning Framework for Noise Component Detection from Resting-State Functional MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI data were pre-processed using an in-house infant-specific pipeline ( Wu et al, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2015 ; Jiang et al, 2019b ) which shares some common steps with the HCP pipeline ( https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines ), including head motion correction, alignment of rsfMRI images to T1 space, and band-pass filtering (0.01 Hz-0.08 Hz), but adds several unique steps tailored to infant functional connectivity MRI ( Kam et al, 2019 ). Brain tissue segmentation was first conducted to generate tissue labeling maps (gray matter, white matter, or cerebrospinal fluid) using a multi-site infant-dedicated computational toolbox, iBEAT v2.0 Cloud ( http://www.ibeat.cloud ) ( Wang et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MRI data were pre-processed using an in-house infant-specific pipeline ( Wu et al, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2015 ; Jiang et al, 2019b ) which shares some common steps with the HCP pipeline ( https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines ), including head motion correction, alignment of rsfMRI images to T1 space, and band-pass filtering (0.01 Hz-0.08 Hz), but adds several unique steps tailored to infant functional connectivity MRI ( Kam et al, 2019 ). Brain tissue segmentation was first conducted to generate tissue labeling maps (gray matter, white matter, or cerebrospinal fluid) using a multi-site infant-dedicated computational toolbox, iBEAT v2.0 Cloud ( http://www.ibeat.cloud ) ( Wang et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tissue labeling maps were used to register to the template (Colin 27 atlas) ( Holmes et al, 1998 ) in MNI space using advanced normalization tools (ANTs) ( Avants et al, 2011 ). Automatic noise-related component detection and regression were performed ( Kam et al, 2019 ). Specifically, a deep learning-based rsfMRI QC method, the long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network ( Yan et al, 2018 , 2019 ), was employed, capable of effectively extracting FC quality-related features from the raw data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After conservative high-pass filtering with a sigma of 1,000 s to remove linear trends in the data, individual independent component analysis was conducted to decompose each of the preprocessed rs-fMRI data into 150 components using MELODIC in FSL. An automatic deep learning-based noise-related component identification algorithm was used to identify and remove non-signal components to clean the rs-fMRI data ( 48 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the denoised neuroimaging datasets are generally not available for the supervised learning based denoising models because of the intimidating cost of the human labeling. The fixed featurebased denoising methods may help here when the cleaned images are not available [9], [10], but the tuning of the model for a slightly modified system are prone to be difficult and the result may diverge from what the neuroscientists expect [11]. Moreover, the optical imaging system is usually under a fast continuous development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%