2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep learning-based multisite neuroimage harmonization framework established with a traveling-subject dataset

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Papers were also categorised according to the harmonisation features: raw signals ( n = 29) and image-derived features ( n = 12). Of the 28 studies on sMRI, 24 harmonised raw intensity signals, while four studies focused on derived measures, including brain volumes [ 25 , 46 ], cortical thickness [ 36 ] and mixed image-based features [ 66 ]. Four studies harmonised the raw diffusion signals of dMRI through dictionary representation [ 31 ] and spherical harmonics representation [ 29 , 39 , 48 ], while three studies focused on derived features [ 28 , 41 , 65 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Papers were also categorised according to the harmonisation features: raw signals ( n = 29) and image-derived features ( n = 12). Of the 28 studies on sMRI, 24 harmonised raw intensity signals, while four studies focused on derived measures, including brain volumes [ 25 , 46 ], cortical thickness [ 36 ] and mixed image-based features [ 66 ]. Four studies harmonised the raw diffusion signals of dMRI through dictionary representation [ 31 ] and spherical harmonics representation [ 29 , 39 , 48 ], while three studies focused on derived features [ 28 , 41 , 65 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that used explicit methods commonly employed statistical tests to compute the probabilities of differences. The most commonly used metrics were Cohen’s d value (e.g., [ 36 , 41 ]), Pearson’s r value (e.g., [ 41 ]), and Kullback–Leibler divergence (e.g., [ 31 , 46 ]). Implicit methods, on the other hand, used the t-SNE algorithm to directly visualise the data distributions based on the features extracted from the trained network.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deep learning frameworks have been employed in a broad spectrum of medical image (post-) reconstruction applications ranging from improving image quality in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT, and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT [316-319], quality control and the identification of EARL-compliance [320], reduction of scan time [318; 319; 321] or reconstruction time [322], and the transformation from one modality to another, generating synthetic low-dose CTs based on non-attenuation-corrected PET images [323], zero-echo-time MRI [324], or synthetic CT based on MRI for radiotherapy planning [325]. For PET harmonisation, we could learn from (predominantly T1-weighted) MRI, where deep learning is used for the harmonisation in multicentre effects [326][327][328]. In the years to come, these algorithms will be developed even further, which requires large amounts of data.…”
Section: Acquisition and Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%