2022 IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference (MysuruCon) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/mysurucon55714.2022.9972589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning Approach to Classify Drones and Birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many research works have been published to address UAV detection, tracking, and classification problems. The main drone detection technologies are: radar sensors [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], RF sensors [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], audio sensors [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ], and camera sensors using visual UAV characteristics [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Based on the above-mentioned sources, the advantages and disadvantages of each drone detection technology are compared in Table 2 .…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, many research works have been published to address UAV detection, tracking, and classification problems. The main drone detection technologies are: radar sensors [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], RF sensors [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], audio sensors [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ], and camera sensors using visual UAV characteristics [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Based on the above-mentioned sources, the advantages and disadvantages of each drone detection technology are compared in Table 2 .…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results demonstrated that all evaluation metric values for improved YOLOv5 outperformed the baseline model. Drone and bird detection based on YOLOv4 and YOLOv5 was conducted in [ 64 ]. A custom dataset compiled from several online sources consists of 900 images: 664 images for drones and 236 images for birds.…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They obtained an f1 score of 98% with YOLOv4 and 94% with YOLOv5. The YOLOv4 model achieved a detection speed of 54 fps on GPU and 12 fps on CPU, while the YOLOv5 model achieved a detection speed of 77 fps on GPU and 27 fps on CPU [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%