2019
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep learning‐ and partial least square regression‐based model observer for a low‐contrast lesion detection task in CT

Abstract: Purpose This work aims to develop a new framework of image quality assessment using deep learning-based model observer (DL-MO) and to validate it in a low-contrast lesion detection task that involves CT images with patient anatomical background. Methods The DL-MO was developed using the transfer learning strategy to incorporate a pretrained deep convolutional neural network (CNN), a partial least square regression discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model and an internal noise component. The CNN was previously tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since CNNs require a large amount of labeled training data [15], this approach involves extensive human observer studies, contradicting to the original purpose of anthropomorphic model observers. Another recent approach incorporates the transfer learning and an internal noise component to reduce the required amount of labeled training data and calibrate model observer performance, respectively [20]. However, the explicit use of the internal noise component might restrict the generalization performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since CNNs require a large amount of labeled training data [15], this approach involves extensive human observer studies, contradicting to the original purpose of anthropomorphic model observers. Another recent approach incorporates the transfer learning and an internal noise component to reduce the required amount of labeled training data and calibrate model observer performance, respectively [20]. However, the explicit use of the internal noise component might restrict the generalization performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As additional examples of the value of these data, within our own research program and clinical practice, we have used these and other data to. determine optimal protocol settings in our large subspecialty clinical practice, 35–38 conduct multireader, multicase (MRMC) studies to discern the impact of different reconstruction algorithms, patient dose levels and other factors on radiologist diagnostic performance and confidence, 12–16,20,35–37,39,40 develop, and evaluate using MRMC studies, nonlocal means and deep learning‐based image denoising methods, 41–43 and develop model observers and deep learning methods from phantom or patient data to predict human observer performance of radiologists when interpreting patient data to allow rapid optimization of protocols for any scanner model, exam type, or patient characteristics 17–19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…develop, and evaluate using MRMC studies, nonlocal means and deep learning-based image denoising methods, [41][42][43] and 4. develop model observers and deep learning methods from phantom or patient data to predict human observer performance of radiologists when interpreting patient data to allow rapid optimization of protocols for any scanner model, exam type, or patient characteristics. [17][18][19] This data library, however, does have several limitations. The DICOM-CT-PD format is an extended DICOM format because its header needed to contain data in private tags beyond those defined in the standard DICOM information object definition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean area under the curve values and 95% confidence intervals across all protocols and readers are shown TCM SD of 7.5 TCM SD of 14 120 kVp 0.821 (0.802 to 0.840) 0.776 (0.757 to 0.795) p = 0.003 100 kVp 0.839 (0.820 to 0.858) 0.819 (0.800 to 0.837) p = 0.354 p = 0.184 p = 0.002 performance of radiologists in the clinical setting but also subject to significant variability and time-consuming. Future work could address this limitation by using a model observer approach [33]. CT protocols vary considerably between scanners and institutions and it is likely that many patients could be examined more efficiently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%