2007
DOI: 10.1086/522830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Chandra Observation of Kepler's Supernova Remnant: A Type Ia Event with Circumstellar Interaction

Abstract: We present initial results of a 750 ks Chandra observation of the remnant of Kepler's supernova of AD 1604. The strength and prominence of iron emission, together with the absence of O-rich ejecta, demonstrate that Kepler resulted from a thermonuclear supernova, even though evidence for circumstellar interaction is also strong. We have analyzed spectra of over 100 small regions, and find that they fall into three classes. (1) The vast majority show Fe L emission between 0.7 and 1 keV and Si and S Ka emission; … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
163
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
12
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable cases are those of the SN 1987A (see Moseley et al 1989;Matsuura et al 2011), the Crab Nebula (Gomez et al 2012), Cas A (Hines et al 2004), as well as the undecided type Kepler SN (see Reynolds et al 2007;, leading in all cases to dust masses, M d , of the order of several tenths to a few solar masses. The implication is that the condensation of refractory elements into dust is very efficient in the ejecta of core-collapse SNe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable cases are those of the SN 1987A (see Moseley et al 1989;Matsuura et al 2011), the Crab Nebula (Gomez et al 2012), Cas A (Hines et al 2004), as well as the undecided type Kepler SN (see Reynolds et al 2007;, leading in all cases to dust masses, M d , of the order of several tenths to a few solar masses. The implication is that the condensation of refractory elements into dust is very efficient in the ejecta of core-collapse SNe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See, for example, Winkler et al 2014for SN 1006and Hammell & Fesen 2008 for Cas A.) Radiative knots in the interior of Kepler's SNR (CE 1604) may be CSM, but some knots ahead of the blast wave are ejecta (Reynolds et al 2007). As the 56 Ni synthesized in a CC explosion decays, its decay products will heat local material which will then expand into cooler ejecta (the "nickel bubble" effect; Li et al 1993).…”
Section: Ejecta-driven Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a red supergiant (RSG) progenitor, the pre-explosion spectrum includes relatively little ionizing radiation, but the shock breakout of the RSG envelope will produce a UV flash that can ionize all the surrounding material (normally the RSG wind) out to a distance that can be many pc. A compact progenitor that has lost most of its envelope would not produce such a UV flash, but would have had a much stronger pre-explosion ionizing flux (Reynolds et al 2007).…”
Section: Radiative Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Tycho's SNR is the prototype of a type Ia SN, Kepler's SNR is probably a type Ia as well, but with substantial circumstellar material (Reynolds et al 2007). In both remnants, a radial onion elemental structure is roughly preserved with iron toward the inner region and silicon in the outer ones (Decourchelle et al 2001;Cassam-Chenaï et al 2004a).…”
Section: Nucleosynthesis Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%