Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Decomposable Model for Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Representation

Abstract: Recently, disentanglement based on a generative adversarial network or a variational autoencoder has significantly advanced the performance of diverse applications in CV and NLP domains. Nevertheless, those models still work on coarse levels in the disentanglement of closely related properties, such as syntax and semantics in human languages. This paper introduces a deep decomposable model based on VAE to disentangle syntax and semantics by using total correlation penalties on KL divergences. Notably, we decom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This separation was performed on various characteristics in text such as style (John et al, 2020;Cheng et al, 2020), sentiment and topic (Xu et al, 2020), or word morphology (Behjati and Henderson, 2021). In works on disentanglement, consequent efforts have been put in the separation between syntax and semantics, whether merely to obtain an interpretable specialization in the embedding space Bao et al, 2019;Ravfogel et al, 2020;, or for controllable generation Chen et al, 2020;Hosking and Lapata, 2021;Li et al, 2021;Hosking et al, 2022). However, all these works rely on syntactic information (constituency parses and PoS tags) or semantic information (paraphrase pairs).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This separation was performed on various characteristics in text such as style (John et al, 2020;Cheng et al, 2020), sentiment and topic (Xu et al, 2020), or word morphology (Behjati and Henderson, 2021). In works on disentanglement, consequent efforts have been put in the separation between syntax and semantics, whether merely to obtain an interpretable specialization in the embedding space Bao et al, 2019;Ravfogel et al, 2020;, or for controllable generation Chen et al, 2020;Hosking and Lapata, 2021;Li et al, 2021;Hosking et al, 2022). However, all these works rely on syntactic information (constituency parses and PoS tags) or semantic information (paraphrase pairs).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This separation was performed on various characteristics in text such as style (John et al, 2020;Cheng et al, 2020), sentiment and topic (Xu et al, 2020), or word morphology (Behjati and Henderson, 2021). In works on disentanglement, consequent efforts have been put in the separation between syntax and semantics, whether merely to obtain an interpretable specialization in the embedding space Bao et al, 2019;Ravfogel et al, 2020;, or for controllable generation Chen et al, 2020;Li et al, 2021). However, all these works rely on syntactic information (constituency parses and PoS tags) or semantic information (paraphrase pairs).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%