2016
DOI: 10.37236/5940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decomposition of Parking Functions by Undesired Spaces

Abstract: There is a well-known bijection between parking functions of a fixed length and maximal chains of the noncrossing partition lattice which we can use to associate to each set of parking functions a poset whose Hasse diagram is the union of the corresponding maximal chains. We introduce a decomposition of parking functions based on the largest number omitted and prove several theorems about the corresponding posets. In particular, they share properties with the noncrossing partition lattice such as local self-du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we consider a subposet of (PE n , ≤ dref ) that was introduced in [4]. To that end recall that a function f : [n] → [n] is a parking function if for all k ∈ [n] the cardinality of f −1 [k] is at least k. It is a classical result that the number of parking functions of length n is (n + 1) n−1 [6, Proposition 2.6.1].…”
Section: A Subposet Of (Pe N ≤ Dref )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Now we consider a subposet of (PE n , ≤ dref ) that was introduced in [4]. To that end recall that a function f : [n] → [n] is a parking function if for all k ∈ [n] the cardinality of f −1 [k] is at least k. It is a classical result that the number of parking functions of length n is (n + 1) n−1 [6, Proposition 2.6.1].…”
Section: A Subposet Of (Pe N ≤ Dref )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the poset (PE 4 , ≤ pchn ). This poset was extensively studied in [4]. For our purposes the next statement is the most relevant.…”
Section: A Subposet Of (Pe N ≤ Dref )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in [13] Edelman introduced the k-divisible noncrossing partition lattice, the subposet of N C n where each partition has all of its block sizes divisible by k. Later, Armstrong [2] introduced and studied the k-divisible noncrossing partition lattice for each finite Coxeter group. More recently, motivated by the connection between the noncrossing partition lattice and parking functions, Bruce, Dougherty, Hlavacek, Kudo, and Nicolas [12] introduced a subposet of the noncrossing partition lattice obtained by removing chains that corresponded to parking functions with certain restrictions. To solve a conjecture put forward in that article, Mühle [23] defined two new subposets of the noncrossing partition lattice obtained by removing partitions which do not contain certain blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [13] Edelman introduced the k-divisible noncrossing partition lattice, the subposet of NC n where each partition has all of its block sizes divisible by k. Later, Armstrong [2] introduced and studied the k-divisible noncrossing partition lattice for each finite Coxeter group. More recently, motivated by the connection between the noncrossing partition lattice and parking functions, Bruce, Dougherty, Hlavacek, Kudo, and Nicolas [12] introduced a subposet of the noncrossing partition lattice obtained by removing chains that corresponded to parking functions with certain restrictions. To solve a conjecture put forward in that article, Mühle [23] defined two new subposets of the noncrossing partition lattice obtained by removing partitions which do not contain certain blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%