2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decomposition-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with angle-based adaptive penalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The penalty factor incremental strategy was proposed to balance the diversity and convergence [45]. After this pioneering work, the dynamic adjustment strategy of penalty factor was paid great attention particularly in [2]. A unique weight vectors adjustment strategy was devised in [46].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty factor incremental strategy was proposed to balance the diversity and convergence [45]. After this pioneering work, the dynamic adjustment strategy of penalty factor was paid great attention particularly in [2]. A unique weight vectors adjustment strategy was devised in [46].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual uses the information of adjacent solutions to evolve in order to obtain the optimal solution. At present, the improvement of MOEA/D is mainly concerned with improvements in the weight vector, decomposition method, matching selection, evolutionary operator, replacement and selection method, and computing resource allocation [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Various improvement methods have been carried out according to the basic framework of MOEA/D.…”
Section: Basic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ob obj− mod = Ob obj + Penalty (16) The specific application of PFA method can be referred to literatures [19]- [21]. Proverbially, the performance of PFA method is closely related to the appropriateness of penalty coefficients.…”
Section: A: Penalty Function Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Compute the relative performance of the So 1 solution in contrast to the So 2 one (P uv (So 1 )) as formula (21).…”
Section: ) Fudf Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%