2011
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.571456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decomposition-based approach to flexible flow shop scheduling under machine breakdown

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a real-world distributed permutation flowshop, however, scheduling is a reactive process in which unexpected events may render the generated schedules infeasible. Since machine breakdown commonly occurs after long-time operation in the manufacturing industry (Chen, 2006;Wang and Choi, 2012), this paper considers the DPFSP under machine breakdown.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a real-world distributed permutation flowshop, however, scheduling is a reactive process in which unexpected events may render the generated schedules infeasible. Since machine breakdown commonly occurs after long-time operation in the manufacturing industry (Chen, 2006;Wang and Choi, 2012), this paper considers the DPFSP under machine breakdown.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preemption is not allowed and infinite intermediate buffers exist between two successive stages. The scheduling problem is to choose a machine at each stage for each job and determine the sequence of jobs on each machine so as to minimize the makespan [14].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their simulation results showed its superiority. Wang and Choi [14] proposed a decomposition-based approach that integrates the completely reactive approach with the predictive reactive approach to minimize the makespan of the flexible flowshop scheduling problem under machine breakdown. Mirabi et al [15] considered a two-stage hybrid flowshop scheduling problem where the machine may not always be available during the scheduling period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By algorithm, these can be divided into classical algorithms, approximation algorithms and intelligent algorithms [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Classical algorithms include the dynamic programming method and branch and bound algorithm; the approximation algorithms include the simulation algorithm, NEH algorithm and Lagrangian relaxation algorithm; and intelligent algorithms include the annealing algorithm, tabu search algorithm and genetic algorithm [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. These algorithms are very effective in solving specific problems, but all subject to some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%