Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1599410.1599430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A declarative semantics for Bousi~Prolog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in [11,10,22] we provided some advances in the design of declarative semantics and/or correctness properties regarding the development of fuzzy logic languages dealing with similarity/proximity relations (Bousi∼Prolog) or highly expressive lattices modeling truth degrees (MALP). As a matter of future work we want to establish that analogous -but reinforced-formal properties also hold in the language FASILL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in [11,10,22] we provided some advances in the design of declarative semantics and/or correctness properties regarding the development of fuzzy logic languages dealing with similarity/proximity relations (Bousi∼Prolog) or highly expressive lattices modeling truth degrees (MALP). As a matter of future work we want to establish that analogous -but reinforced-formal properties also hold in the language FASILL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are extended to cope with similarities. Concretely, following the line of Bousi∼Prolog [11], the most general unifier is replaced by the concept of weak most general unifier (w.m.g.u.) and a weak unification algorithm is introduced to compute it.…”
Section: Definition 24 (Program) a Program P Is A Tuple π R L Whementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the concept of (Julian-Iranzo et al 2009, 2010) is similar but not identical with one of our former ideas about evaluating of special fuzzy Datalog programs (Achs 2006). Reading these papers has led to the assumption that this former idea may be the base of a top-down-like evaluation strategy in special multivalued cases as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As noted by (Shenoi and Melton 1999) and other authors, the transitivity property required for similarity relations may conflict with user's intentions in some cases. The Bousi∼Prolog language (Julián-Iranzo et al 2009;Julián-Iranzo and Rubio-Manzano 2009b;Julián-Iranzo and Rubio-Manzano 2009a) has been designed with the aim of generalizing SLP to work with proximity relations. A different generalization of SLP is the SQLP scheme (Caballero et al 2008), designed as an extension of the QLP scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%