2016
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Évaluation de programme : La présente étude peut être rattachée à la notion « d'évaluation de programme » (Joly et al, 2016). La recherche fondamentale, commune dans le milieu universitaire, vise la création de connaissances originales.…”
Section: Méthodologieunclassified
“…Évaluation de programme : La présente étude peut être rattachée à la notion « d'évaluation de programme » (Joly et al, 2016). La recherche fondamentale, commune dans le milieu universitaire, vise la création de connaissances originales.…”
Section: Méthodologieunclassified
“…In addition, the authors introduce a variety of pedagogical strategies; however, they may have overestimated the importance of synthesizing the approaches. Joly et al (2016) argue the importance of developing a consistent method while selecting the review process for genomics and bioinformatics projects. Another important issue of the paper claims that several ethics review policies are not enough to determine the appropriate level of a review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%