A decision support tool for the adaptive reuse or demolition and reconstruction of existing buildings

Sfakianaki, Eleni; Moutsatsou, Katerina

doi:10.1504/ijesd.2015.066893

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Kibert (2008), the paradigm shift from demolition to deconstruction is crucial, because of its significant reduction of waste and energy consumption (Akinade et al , 2017). In the same vein, Sfakianaki and Moutsatou (2015) discussed adaptive reuse instead of demolition of buildings, providing, in addition to the obvious environmental benefits, respect for cultural and architectural heritage. All the above decisions are based predominantly on the initial design.…”

Section: Results—findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical success factors for sustainable construction: a literature review

Sfakianaki

2019

MEQ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to synthesize and evaluate the available literature with respect to critical success factors (CSFs) for sustainable construction (SC). Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review (SLR) was undertaken to assist in the identification of the most pertinent papers from three publishers: Emerald, Elsevier and Wiley. The literature findings were assessed and presented relative to publication, author and contents as determined by review. Findings The SLR was conducted using a number of search criteria. A final set of 31 publications were detected for further examination. The characteristics in terms of publications, authors and contents of the extracted publication set were examined and discussed. A total of 35 factors were identified, distributed in five research categories. The frequency of the extracted factors within the publication set was investigated and enabled valuable quantitative and qualitative observations of current trends for SC. Interestingly, all research categories were represented in the top-counted factors, demonstrating a holistic perception of SC. Given the publication set, in most aspects, the research area examined seems to demonstrate features of an emerging field, which is not yet well established. Research limitations/implications SLR cannot ensure that all pertinent publications were identified, because it was tailored to a number of search criteria, although certain actions were taken to moderate this limitation. However, the outcome adequately identifies trends and offers valuable information and knowledge for SC and its successful implementation. Originality/value The present study presents a broad list of factors for SC, integrated from a variety of disciplines and stakeholders. The findings, therefore, provide a valuable reference for both construction professionals and practitioners attempting to implement SC. Furthermore, the list can be of use to academic scholars for further empirical work and basis for future research.

show abstract

Section: Results—findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical success factors for sustainable construction: a literature review

Sfakianaki

2019

MEQ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The built environment has also been acknowledged to influence the urban climate [18], and since the 1990s, the impact of buildings on the environment has increasingly gained recognition [19]. This is due to modern cities (buildings inclusive) that consume natural resources, and generate heat and pollution in significant and wasteful amounts [18].…”

Section: Literature Review 21 Sustainable Affordable Housing Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A critical rethink of how sustainability enhancement ideas might be required right from the conception stage or design phase of the building project, is vital. Incontrovertibly, the entire life cycle of a building should be considered when evaluating its sustainability [19]. It is, thus, essential to design sustainable urban spaces that improve energy independence and urban resilience; hence, smart green technologies should be promoted in buildings [21].…”

Section: Literature Review 21 Sustainable Affordable Housing Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Success Factor Framework for Implementing Sustainable Innovative and Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The actualization of affordable housing remains a challenge. This challenge is exacerbated by the increasing societal demand for the incorporation of sustainability principles into such housing types to improve levels of occupant health and well-being whilst avouching the desired levels of affordability. Innovative technologies and practices have been described as beneficial to the effectuation of sustainable affordable housing. However, knowledge concerning the deployment of innovative technologies and practices in sustainable affordable housing (sustainable, innovative, affordable housing—SIAH) delivery remains nascent. Consequently, there is a lack of a common ontology among stakeholders concerning how to realize SIAH. This study aims to contribute toward the development of this body of knowledge through the establishment of the critical success factors (CSFs) for effective SIAH implementation. To achieve this objective, a systematic review and bibliometric analysis focusing on a juxtaposition of sustainable, innovative and affordable housing concepts was carried out based on the relevant literature. This led to the identification and clustering of CSFs for these housing concepts at individual levels and as a collective (SIAH). The findings of the study consisted of the establishment of four distinct yet interrelated facets through which SIAH can be achieved holistically, namely, housing design, house element, housing production method and housing technology. A total of 127 CSFs were found to be aligned to these facets, subsequently clustered, and conclusively used for the development of a SIAH CSF framework. The most frequently occurring CSFs with predominant interconnections were the utilization of energy-efficient systems/fittings, tenure security, a comfortable and healthy indoor environment, affordable housing price in relation to income and using water-efficient systems/fittings CSFs, and establishing the emergent SIAH CSF framework. The framework in this study is useful in the documentation of SIAH features for construction projects and further studies into SIAH CSFs.

show abstract

“…Design out waste, durable material selection, reduction in the use of energy in production and operation phase of building materials are some of the strategies identified in COM (2014). Repurposing and adaptive reuse of buildings has been identified as a source of reduction in the environmental, social and economic costs of urban development and expansion (Sfakianaki and Moutsatsou, 2015; Assefa and Ambler, 2017).…”

Section: Building Materials Requirement For Effective Circular Economymentioning

confidence: 99%

Reusability analytics tool for end-of-life assessment of building materials in a circular economy

Akanbi

Oyedele

Delgado

et al. 2019

WJSTSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose In a circular economy, the goal is to keep materials values in the economy for as long as possible. For the construction industry to support the goal of the circular economy, there is the need for materials reuse. However, there is little or no information about the amount and quality of reusable materials obtainable when buildings are deconstructed. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to develop a reusability analytics tool for assessing end-of-life status of building materials. Design/methodology/approach A review of the extant literature was carried out to identify the best approach to modelling end-of-life reusability assessment tool. The reliability analysis principle and materials properties were used to develop the predictive mathematical model for assessing building materials performance. The model was tested using the case study of a building design and materials take-off quantities as specified in the bill of quantity of the building design. Findings The results of analytics show that the quality of the building materials varies with the building component. For example, from the case study, at the 80th year of the building, the qualities of the obtainable concrete from the building are 0.9865, 0.9835, 0.9728 and 0.9799, respectively, from the foundation, first floor, frame and stair components of the building. Originality/value As a contribution to the concept of circular economy in the built environment, the tool provides a foundation for estimating the quality of obtainable building materials at the end-of-life based on the life expectancy of the building materials.

show abstract

A decision support tool for the adaptive reuse or demolition and reconstruction of existing buildings

Cited by 15 publications

References 11 publications

Critical success factors for sustainable construction: a literature review

Critical success factors for sustainable construction: a literature review

A Critical Success Factor Framework for Implementing Sustainable Innovative and Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Reusability analytics tool for end-of-life assessment of building materials in a circular economy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About