1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-3615(96)00067-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision support system for project portfolio selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have used utility function as selection tool [9], Goal-programming models [10,11]. Project selection problem using fuzzy theory has been discussed [12]. Project selection problem using various MCDM tools such as ARAS, MOORA, VIKOR, and COPRAS have been demonstrated [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Prior Work Project Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have used utility function as selection tool [9], Goal-programming models [10,11]. Project selection problem using fuzzy theory has been discussed [12]. Project selection problem using various MCDM tools such as ARAS, MOORA, VIKOR, and COPRAS have been demonstrated [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Prior Work Project Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meredith and Mantel (2011) have discussed various qualitative and quantitative project selection models. Chu et al (1996) demonstrated project selection process using fuzzy theory. Tuysuz and Kahraman (2006) stated that fuzzy sets theory was especially powerful when there was a need to take into consideration the ideas and judgments of people because of complexity and lack of proper information.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se han desarrollado diversos modelos para facilitar el análisis integral de los proyectos de inversión, considerando variables cualitativas y cuantitativas, teniendo en cuenta que cada proyecto es único por naturaleza, desde los que se apoyan en la lógica borrosa (Chu et al, 1996;Coffin y Taylor, 1996), hasta los que utilizan funciones de utilidad (Mehrez y Sinauer-Stern, 1983), el análisis envolvente de datos (DEA) (Eilat, et al 2006) o el proceso de análisis jerárqui-co (Dey, 2006) sin olvidar metodologías clásicas, específicamen-te orientadas al medio ambiente, como las de la compañía General Electric (1987) y la USEPA (1989).…”
Section: Criterios De Análisis De Selección De Inversiones Medioambieunclassified