1975
DOI: 10.1137/0204006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decision Procedure for the First Order Theory of Real Addition with Order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
123
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this situation it is important to discuss how the symbols from τ are represented in the input of the CSP. In our context, Γ is semilinear, it is natural to assume that the relations are given as quantifier-free formulas in disjunctive normal form where the coefficients are represented in binary (by the mentioned result of Ferrante and Rackoff [14], every relation with a first-order definition over (Q; +, , 1) has a definition of this form). However, there are other natural representations, and we will for infinite languages always discuss how the relations are given.…”
Section: Csp(γ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this situation it is important to discuss how the symbols from τ are represented in the input of the CSP. In our context, Γ is semilinear, it is natural to assume that the relations are given as quantifier-free formulas in disjunctive normal form where the coefficients are represented in binary (by the mentioned result of Ferrante and Rackoff [14], every relation with a first-order definition over (Q; +, , 1) has a definition of this form). However, there are other natural representations, and we will for infinite languages always discuss how the relations are given.…”
Section: Csp(γ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relation R ⊆ Q n is semilinear if R has a first-order definition in (Q; +, , 1); equivalently, R is a finite union of finite intersections of (open or closed) linear half spaces; see Ferrante and Rackoff [14]. In this article we study the computational complexity of constraint satisfaction problems with semilinear constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Pre29,Tar51,KK67,FR75]. In this section, we establish such a property to prove the pspace upper bound of the IPC ++ -satisfiability problem.…”
Section: Quantifier Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For linear real arithmetic, Ferrante and Racko 's method [12] and Loos and Weispfenning's method [16] belong to this class, and so does Cooper's method for Presburger arithmetic [7]. Other methods, more geometrical in kind, project conjunctions of atoms and thus need some form of conversion to DNF; such is the case of Fourier-Mozkin elimination for linear real arithmetic, and of Pugh's Omega test for Presburger arithmetic [23].…”
Section: Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%