A Decision-Analytic Approach to Managing Climate Risks: Application to the Upper Great Lakes1

Abstract

Brown, Casey, William Werick, Wendy Leger, and David Fay, 2011. A Decision‐Analytic Approach to Managing Climate Risks: Application to the Upper Great Lakes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 47(3):524‐534. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2011.00552.x Abstract: In this paper, we present a risk analysis and management process designed for use in water resources planning and management under climate change. The process incorporates climate information through a method called decision‐scaling, whereby information related to climate projections is tailored for use in a decision‐analytic framework. The climate risk management process begins with the identification of vulnerabilities by asking stakeholders and resource experts what water conditions they could cope with and which would require substantial policy or investment shifts. The identified vulnerabilities and thresholds are formalized with a water resources systems model that relates changes in the physical climate conditions to the performance metrics corresponding to vulnerabilities. The irreducible uncertainty of climate change projections is addressed through a dynamic management plan embedded within an adaptive management process. Implementation of the process is described as applied in the ongoing International Upper Great Lakes Study.

Drought Adaptation in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China: Actions, Planning, Pathways and Barriers

“…As a result, the number of successful CC adaptation strategies implemented is small, despite good recommendations from scientists [17,31]. Thus, more decision-oriented adaptation research and practices are emerging [50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. This aspect of the scientific literature, however, reveals the limitations of the reported in developing countries, where much of the adaptation planning and actions are conducted.…”

Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Models: A Systematic Review with Practical Workflow

“…Applications of SA for this purpose are far less numerous than those for uncertainty investigation and model calibration. However, they are increasingly investigated, see for example Brown et al (2011), Singh et al (2014) and references therein.…”

An alternate approach to assessing climate risks

“…Climate scenarios can be generated parametrically or stochastically to explore uncertainty in climate variables that affect the system of interest [Prudhomme at al., 2010;Brown et al, 2011]. This allows sampling changes in climate that include but are not constrained by the range of GCM projections.…”

“…Other climate modelers assert that the spread of uncertainty may be reduced by adjusting known model biases in simulating present climate [Boberg and Christensen, 2012]. Some researchers are beginning to think that it is better to generate climate scenarios in such a way that one can control, by design, the range of climate changes in the specific variables of interest [e.g., Prudhomme et al, 2010;Brown et al, 2011].…”