2015 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1109/scc.2015.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decentralized Locality-Preserving Context-Aware Service Discovery Framework for Internet of Things

Abstract: Today's Internet is shifting towards a larger and smarter scenario known as the Internet of Things (IoTs). The IoT envisions a multitude of heterogeneous objects and interactions with physical environments. In this environment, locating desirable services is challenging due to the considerable diversity, large number, dynamic behavior, and geographical distribution of the services provided by physical objects. In this paper, we propose a context-aware semanticsbased service discovery mechanism -LOCA that can e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If no taxonomic relationship exists between the concepts, then these concepts are considered disjoint; in this case, the method ConceptSimilarityScore() will return a score 0. Otherwise, the score will be calculated by using equations (2) and (5). For example, the score of both attributes (activity description and location description) of service O3 in Table 4 is 0 because both concepts are declared disjoint in the application ontology (Fig.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If no taxonomic relationship exists between the concepts, then these concepts are considered disjoint; in this case, the method ConceptSimilarityScore() will return a score 0. Otherwise, the score will be calculated by using equations (2) and (5). For example, the score of both attributes (activity description and location description) of service O3 in Table 4 is 0 because both concepts are declared disjoint in the application ontology (Fig.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the above‐discussed context‐aware ontology‐based semantic matching approaches address many limitations of the traditional service matching approaches, there are still certain issues that must be addressed for effective service discovery, matching and ranking, respectively. It is particularly necessary for any approach in the DERTS environment to consider role, resources, schedules, value type direction, as well as timeliness and user priorities during the service matching and ranking process (these are some of the requirements which were common, identified during the review of literature [5–28] and proposed by the experts). In addition, if no exact service matches, corresponding to user's defined criteria, are found the approach should return the approximate results to the user [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are several well-known drawbacks that make this approach unsuitable for IoT in a real-world scenario, e.g., low scalability and dependability. To overcome these limitations, other approaches have relied on distributed repositories to support the discovery process [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%