2012 American Control Conference (ACC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2012.6315478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decentralized fault prognosis scheme for nonlinear interconnected discrete-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with c i and˛i satisfying the conditions (7) and (9), R i . / satisfying conditions (26) and (27). Then, the result can be readily obtained based on Lemmas 5 and 6 given in Appendix 1.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…with c i and˛i satisfying the conditions (7) and (9), R i . / satisfying conditions (26) and (27). Then, the result can be readily obtained based on Lemmas 5 and 6 given in Appendix 1.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The decentralized stabilization problems of large-scale systems with unknown interconnections have been studied by Xiong et al [28], Ma et al [29], and Meskin and Khorasani [33], whereas FDI is not covered. Considering time-invariant models, the decentralized FDI problems for nonlinear interconnected systems have been studied by Yan and Edwards [25], and Ferdowsi et al [26,27]. Unfortunately, little attention has been focused on Markovian Jump interconnected systems with unknown interconnections in the presence of process fault.…”
Section: Definition 1 ([8])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover the processing of the information at a centralized station imposes several risks since the station constitutes a single point of failure, thus making the architecture possibly fragile to faults. Recent ad-vances in communications and distributed sensing have allowed the transition from centralized fault diagnosis approaches [33,100,18,65,9] towards the development of hierarchical, decentralized and distributed schemes [66,54,102,56,108,89,15,84,29,31,48,49,96,90,76,52,75,55,8,40,23,78,14,13].…”
Section: Distributed and Networked Large-scale Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years though, due to advances in computing and communications mainly, the focus of the research activities is directed mostly towards the development of hierarchical (Klinkhieo & Patton, 2009; R. J. Patton et al, 2007), decentralized (Ferdowsi, Raja, & Jagannathan, 2012;Léchevin & Rabbath, 2009;Stankovic, Ilic, Djurovic, Stankovic, & Johansson, 2010;Wei, Gui, Xie, & Ding, 2009;X. Zhang, Polycarpou, & Parisini, 2009) and distributed (Boem, Ferrari, & Parisini, 2011;Ferrari, Parisini, & Polycarpou, 2012;Keliris, Polycarpou, & Parisini, 2013a;Yan, Tian, & Shi, 2008) schemes for process or sensor faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%