2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decentralized adaptive fuzzy robust strategy for control of upright standing posture in paraplegia using functional electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feedback control has been previously used for control of hand grasp (Lujan and Crago, 2009), standing posture (Fraix et al, 2006; Rosin et al, 2011), and locomotion (Roham et al, 2007; Takmakov et al, 2010; Fitzgerald, 2014) in SCI individuals. Simple feedback control can be improved by using adaptive systems (Karniel and Inbar, 2000; Kobravi and Erfanian, 2012). Adaptive algorithms modify controller behavior in response to changes in the system and the environment (Chizek et al, 1988; Narendra, 1990; Narendra and Parthasarathy, 1990; Teixeira et al, 1991; Kostov et al, 1995; Davoodi and Andrews, 1998, 1999; Jonić et al, 1999; Abbas and Riener, 2001).…”
Section: Optimal Control Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback control has been previously used for control of hand grasp (Lujan and Crago, 2009), standing posture (Fraix et al, 2006; Rosin et al, 2011), and locomotion (Roham et al, 2007; Takmakov et al, 2010; Fitzgerald, 2014) in SCI individuals. Simple feedback control can be improved by using adaptive systems (Karniel and Inbar, 2000; Kobravi and Erfanian, 2012). Adaptive algorithms modify controller behavior in response to changes in the system and the environment (Chizek et al, 1988; Narendra, 1990; Narendra and Parthasarathy, 1990; Teixeira et al, 1991; Kostov et al, 1995; Davoodi and Andrews, 1998, 1999; Jonić et al, 1999; Abbas and Riener, 2001).…”
Section: Optimal Control Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of FES closed-loop control strategies have been investigated, predominantly focusing on plantarflexion/dorsiflexion control of the ankle joints during stance. These have included linear quadratic Gaussian (Hunt et al, 1997; Munih et al, 1997), pole placement design (Hunt et al, 2001; Gollee et al, 2004), H-infinity (Holderbaum et al, 2004), artificial neural network, and sliding mode (Kobravi and Erfanian, 2012) control techniques. However, these control techniques suffer from limitations, including the need for voluntary trunk control, the lack of a strong physiological basis and/or high computational complexity limiting the operating frequency of thecontroller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,20] In order to control FES-evoked contraction levels, typical commercially available stimulators allow researchers and rehabilitation practitioners to regulate PA (or PD) and to maintain PD (or PA) constant. [21,22] Pulse charge (PA×PD) is a main determinant of motor unit recruitment. Increasing the PA produces a stronger depolarising drive that travels deeper into the underlying tissue [23] and recruits a greater number of motor units, [16] whereas adjusting the PD influences not only the number of recruited motor units, but may also influence the selectivity of motor unit recruitment, due to threshold differences that exist between axons of different diameter lying at the same distance from the stimulating electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%