A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011

Abstract

Theoretical discussions and empirical studies on the nexus between corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance and corporate financial performance have never ceased since the origin of the concepts. The development trajectories of such studies should be articulated with a view to informing practical corporate social responsibility applications and theoretical studies in the future. This paper presents a critical review of relevant empirical research articles on the nexus between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance published during the ten-year period from 2002 to 2011. Using mixed-methods of content analyses and statistical analyses, the paper reviews 84 empirical studies of this kind published during the period. The results indicate that, despite the enormous amount of previous studies, the corporate social performance and corporate financial performance nexus is a line of inquiry that remains inconclusive. The pattern of corporate social performance-corporate financial performance relationship research in the decade examined has shifted towards exploring the linkages between specific aspects of the two constructs. The positive relationships between these specific aspects in dual directions are confirmed by most of the studies examined in this paper. The paper also examines the impact of time and space change on the corporate social performance-corporate financial performance nexus. The findings show that researchers have gradually recognized that the relationship is not static but changes over time. Furthermore, the paper finds that corporate social responsibility has been increasingly debated in developing countries and in specified industrial settings. The review concludes that to explore the corporate social performance-corporate financial performance nexus by contextualizing it in a specified community, and/or examine its dynamics is a promising

Firms’ Board Independence and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta-Analysis

“…Following Carroll [29], Wood [30] provides one of the first definitions of CSP, indicating that it refers to "a business organization's configuration of principles of social responsibility, process of social responsiveness, and policies, programs, and observable outcomes as they relate to the firm's societal relationships". Other researchers provide additional definitions of CSP, such as that given by Lu et al [31]. This confusion means that there are many ways to model CSP and to investigate its relationship with some organizational outputs such as corporate financial performance (CFP) [32].…”

The impact of sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation practices on the organisational performance: a cross-country comparison

“…Prior research has both theoretically (e.g., Endrikat et al, 2014;Lu et al, 2014) and empirically (e.g., Wagner, 2010) attempted to establish a relationship between corporate sustainability performance and economic performance. Moreover, Chang and Kuo (2008) found that a positive reciprocal causality may exist between sustainability and profitability.…”

What to make of unprofitable corporate social responsibility

“…As it comes to evaluating potential projects, the guidance the literature offers is merely that "after more than thirty years of research, we cannot clearly conclude whether a one-dollar investment in social initiatives returns more or less than one dollar in benefit to the shareholder" [Barnett, (2007), p.794]. Additional time has not resolved the controversy; Lu et al (2014) has since confirmed through meta-analysis that the debate has yet to be concluded in this decade.…”