2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decade of Work Coming Together: Nutrition Care, Electronic Health Records, and the HITECH Act

Abstract: Ten years of strategic direction and resource development by the American Dietetic Association (ADA) has positioned the profession for nutrition care integration into health information technology (HIT), specifically electronic health records (EHRs) and personal health records (PHRs). New legislation included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) (1) creates an unprecedented opportunity to bring this work in to the spotlight, improve health care, and promote evidence-based decision-making for nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to allow a direct comparison to the published 2013 results (22) , the same nutrition informatics survey (which was originally adapted from the Academy Nutrition Informatics Committee and HIMSS Analytics survey (24) ) was utilised to survey Australian dietitians again in 2016 to provide the second cross-sectional analysis. Although Nutrition Care Process Terminology (NCPT) is referred to in the survey questions, 'standards' as the fifth dimension was not included in the survey questions because these are well documented and accepted international dietetic standards and process terminology (25)(26)(27) . The final 30-item questionnaire collected demographic information, educational support preferences, eHealth usage and assessed four dimensions relating to eHealth readiness: accessibility readiness, aptitudinal readiness and advocacy readiness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to allow a direct comparison to the published 2013 results (22) , the same nutrition informatics survey (which was originally adapted from the Academy Nutrition Informatics Committee and HIMSS Analytics survey (24) ) was utilised to survey Australian dietitians again in 2016 to provide the second cross-sectional analysis. Although Nutrition Care Process Terminology (NCPT) is referred to in the survey questions, 'standards' as the fifth dimension was not included in the survey questions because these are well documented and accepted international dietetic standards and process terminology (25)(26)(27) . The final 30-item questionnaire collected demographic information, educational support preferences, eHealth usage and assessed four dimensions relating to eHealth readiness: accessibility readiness, aptitudinal readiness and advocacy readiness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) has led international efforts in defining and developing the field of nutrition informatics. The Academy Nutrition Informatics Committee was founded in 2007 and has initiated numerous projects, including: a nutrition informatics web page and blog, collaborative relationships with global organisations (such as Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society (HIMSS), International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation and Health Level Seven International) and created nutrition informatics competencies across all areas of dietetic practice . The Dietitians Association of Australia (DAA), following the Academy lead, has established a health informatics advisory committee, a health informatics continuing professional development working party and a nutrition informatics interest group to support resource development, continuing professional development and advocacy for nutrition informatics in Australia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the topic of EHR dominates publications in the area of nutrition informatics. Papers outline tremendous potential for dietetics, such as data integration, incorporation of standards, improved monitoring, tracking and reporting, and support of research, all of which contribute to improved efficiencies, clinical decision‐making, cost savings and ultimately patient nutrition care . In 2014, Rossi et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%