2023
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2022.3212626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decade of MRI Compatible Robots: Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of force sensing modules for MIS should be concerned with their physical and functional properties. The former mainly relates to the shape and size of the module, while the latter constraint regards the compatibility, interaction, and performance in the bio-environment [33]. A visionbased force sensing module can be a good candidate for MIS.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of force sensing modules for MIS should be concerned with their physical and functional properties. The former mainly relates to the shape and size of the module, while the latter constraint regards the compatibility, interaction, and performance in the bio-environment [33]. A visionbased force sensing module can be a good candidate for MIS.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main robot body and medical tools are actually constructed of non-magnetic, non-conducting materials. Different solutions are proposed for the mechatronic part of the robot involving electronics, sensors, actuators, etc., which represent a challenging compatibility question [37][38][39][40][41]95,96,110,[112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121].…”
Section: Compatibility Compliance Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…metal artifact correction, improving MR image quality in metallic implants, superconducting magnet designs and MRI accessibility, improved visualization in patients with implants, and 3D-printing techniques for optimized imaging compatibility. Numerous investigations have been carried out on MRI-compatible devices; see examples [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. These concern MRI-compatible devices in cardiac MRI, compatible fiber optic multi sensor, self-supervised reconstruction of gradient descent, safe robotic manipulator, compatible robots, compatible endonasal surgical robotic system, imaging-enhanced cranial neurosurgery, plastic piezoelectric motor stator, and compatible piezoelectric motors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few types of non-electromagnetic actuators with performance suitable for MRI-assisted robotic operation can be used. This could be the case for piezoelectric actuators subject to their MRI compatibility; see, e.g., [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. Such actuators are made of dielectric piezoelectric materials coated with trivial electrodes.…”
Section: Robotic External Matter Introductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Section 2.3, the shape and orientation of these electrodes (conductors) relative to the RF field B 1 allow possible MRI compatibility. Different keys are proposed for the mechatronic division of the robot containing electronics, sensors, actuators, etc., which address a difficult compatibility question [27,29,[41][42][43][44][45][46][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Robotic External Matter Introductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%