A decade of improved access to screening is associated with fewer colorectal cancer deaths in African Americans: a single-center retrospective study

Abstract

BackgroundControversy exists as to whether disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes in African Americans (AAs) are best resolved by screening at age 45 or by proper use of existing guidelines. In 2004, an aggressive colonoscopy-based CRC screening program was implemented throughout New York City. Our goal was to determine the effect of that program on CRC outcomes in our mostly AA population.MethodsCRC cases entered into Harlem Hospital’s tumor registry from January 1992 to December 2011 were divided into two cohorts: 1992-2003, the pre-intensive screening era (PSE), and 2004-2011, the intensive screening era (ISE). Each cohort was reviewed for demographics, indication for colonoscopy, tumor location, tumor stage, and mortality. Multivariate analysis was applied to the pooled cohorts to determine factors associated with survival.ResultsInclusion criteria were met by 379 patients: 207 PSE and 172 ISE. Racial distribution, gender, age at presentation, and tumor location were not different during the two eras. Over 75% of patients were AA. During the ISE, 84% were insured compared to 34% in the PSE (P<0.0001). Fewer patients died during the ISE (21%) than during the PSE (67%) (P<0.0001). The ISE patients were diagnosed with earlier stages of CRC compared to the PSE. Increased survival was associated with being insured (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-2.81), distal tumors (HR 1.43, 95%CI 1.05-1.95), and being female (HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.01-1.850).ConclusionsA multifaceted program reduced CRC outcome disparities in a poor AA community. Aggressive implementation of current colonoscopy screening guidelines still has unrealized potential to reduce CRC mortality disparities in AAs.

Tailoring virtual human‐delivered interventions: A digital intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening for Black women

“…10 Providing opportunities for patients to learn about noninvasive tests may be an important strategy to increase screening rates of Black adults. 11,12…”

“…Possible barriers include low acceptance or knowledge of the noninvasive options among both physicians and patients 8,9 . One study found that Black adults who had not obtained screening were relying on clinician recommendation to test: “So I'm pretty sure if he had a reason for me to get screened, he would tell me (p. 75).” 10 Providing opportunities for patients to learn about noninvasive tests may be an important strategy to increase screening rates of Black adults 11,12 …”