2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12302-018-0170-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decade of fluvial morphodynamics: relocation and restoration of the Inde River (North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany)

Abstract: BackgroundRelocations and restorations do not only change the ecological passability and sediment continuity of a river but also its flow behavior and fluvial morphodynamics. Sediment transport processes and morphological development can be assessed with field measurements, also taking the transport of sediment-bounded contaminants as a tracer material for fluvial morphodynamics into account. The objective of this study was to determine the morphological development of the Inde River (a tributary of the Rur Ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As this is the first study to report an increase in toxicity as well as estrogenic and dioxin-like activity in restored river sections, this may explain the lack of success of many other in-stream restoration projects [13,29,[31][32][33]. A possible explanation for the significantly worse results within the restored sections is the transport and deposition of polluted fine sediments within the restoration measures [18,[119][120][121]. Since the restored sections are characterized by a higher flow diversity, it is conceivable that polluted fine particulate matter, e.g., introduced by soil erosion from surrounding fields [122][123][124][125] or by WWTPs [107,125], may settle in the flow-calmed zones [119,[126][127][128].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Rivers Horloff And Niddamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As this is the first study to report an increase in toxicity as well as estrogenic and dioxin-like activity in restored river sections, this may explain the lack of success of many other in-stream restoration projects [13,29,[31][32][33]. A possible explanation for the significantly worse results within the restored sections is the transport and deposition of polluted fine sediments within the restoration measures [18,[119][120][121]. Since the restored sections are characterized by a higher flow diversity, it is conceivable that polluted fine particulate matter, e.g., introduced by soil erosion from surrounding fields [122][123][124][125] or by WWTPs [107,125], may settle in the flow-calmed zones [119,[126][127][128].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Rivers Horloff And Niddamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, several studies focused on the anthropogenic history of the Wurm River and rivers like the Geul River or the Inde River with similar geomorphic settings, SSLs, and catchment sizes. The results of different studies by Buchty‐Lemke and Lehmkuhl (), Hagemann et al (), Maaß and Schüttrumpf (, ), and Maaß et al () show that floodplain sedimentation rates can be in an order of magnitude of 1 cm/year if the floodplains are prone to overbank flooding due to a constant impoundment of water at mill weirs and can be decreased to 0.1 cm/year due to incised riverbeds and riverbank heights of approximately 2 m. Here, the floodplain sedimentation rates of all numerical model scenarios vary between 0.5 and 1 cm/year that overall include natural as well as anthropogenic impacted floodplain accretion conditions of small river systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River restoration interventions in old‐industrial areas such as the ones analyzed in this study can have negative effects on the distribution of contaminants or positive effects because of the improvement of chemical and ecological conditions (Maaß et al, ). It is important to evaluate the contamination of a study site using its natural state because the initiation of natural morphodynamics includes the transport of fine sediment as an intrinsic component of river‐floodplain systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soma-se a isso ainda os custos de tal atividade que oneram o estado e os empreendimentos (HACKNEY et al, 2017). A diminuição do calado operacional máximo é algo que impacta de modo direto as dimensões das embarcações que podem acessar o rio, podendo se tornar um grande problema em determinados casos (VOLP et al, 2016;MAAB et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified