1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.555977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Database for the Static Dielectric Constant of Water and Steam

Abstract: All reliable sources of data for the static dielectric constant or relative permittivity of water and steam, many of them unpublished or inaccessible, have been collected, evaluated, corrected when required, and converted to the ITS-90 temperature scale. The data extend over a temperature range from 238 to 873 K and over a pressure range from 0.1 MPa up to 1189 MPa. The evaluative part of this work includes a review of the different types of measurement techniques, and the corrections for frequency dependence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
142
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
11
142
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2 shows how e 0 varies with the density and pressure at 1,000 K. For both ab initio and empirical (SPC/E) simulations, e 0 monotonically depends on the density at fixed temperature. When the temperature rises from 1,000 K to 2,000 K, e 0 decreases by about 70% along an isobar, whereas with P increasing from ∼1 GPa to ∼11 GPa, e 0 increases by only about 2.5 times at 1,000 K. The same trend is also found in Fernández et al's experimental database (9), showing that the static dielectric constant of water is more sensitive to temperature along an isobar than to pressure along an isotherm. In Eq.…”
Section: Equation Ofsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 shows how e 0 varies with the density and pressure at 1,000 K. For both ab initio and empirical (SPC/E) simulations, e 0 monotonically depends on the density at fixed temperature. When the temperature rises from 1,000 K to 2,000 K, e 0 decreases by about 70% along an isobar, whereas with P increasing from ∼1 GPa to ∼11 GPa, e 0 increases by only about 2.5 times at 1,000 K. The same trend is also found in Fernández et al's experimental database (9), showing that the static dielectric constant of water is more sensitive to temperature along an isobar than to pressure along an isotherm. In Eq.…”
Section: Equation Ofsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Fig. 1 shows the dielectric constant of water obtained by ab initio MD as a function of the simulation time at ∼1 GPa and 1,000 K. We compared our results with those of the database compiled by Fernández et al (9), which covers the published experimental data until 1995 at P and T up to 1.2 GPa and 873 K, and extrapolated data up to 1 GPa and 1,200 K (13). Our ab initio MD simulations predict a static dielectric constant of ∼15 at 0.88 g/cm 3 , a value that is between those reported by Fernández et al at 0.85 and 0.90 g/cm 3 (Fig.…”
Section: Equation Ofmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…experiments on moist air in the visible [3,9,18,53 [42,61,79] and eventually in the static limit [24], the refractive index plotted as a function of wavelength is more and more structured by individual lines. Since we will not present these functions at high resolution but smooth fits within several bands in the infrared, their spiky appearance sets a natural limit to the far-IR wavelength regions that our approach may cover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large diversity of molecular models are available for liquid water (Guillot 2002;Hess and van der Vegt 2006). Nevertheless, it seems difficult to obtain a model able to reproduce its static dielectric constant (78.43 ± 0.10 at room temperature) (Fernández et al 1995). Only a quite few commonly used water molecular models have recently achieved a reasonable reproduction of its dielectric constant [e.g., Dill's SPC/DC model (78.3 ± 6), (Fennell et al 2012) Barbosa's TIP4P/ (78.3), (Fuentes-Azcatl and Barbosa 2016) Roux & MacKerell's polarizable water model (78.1) (Yu et al 2013)] although the adequacy of their combination with available biomolecular force fields remains to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%