2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ictc.2017.8191055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data streaming performance evaluation using resource constrained edge device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other possibilities would be (i) to run pAElla on the DiG IoT devices as we do, and then use these distributed systems only for training and deployment of the ML models; or (ii) execute these stream services directly on the IoT devices. However, as shown in [67], which benchmarks them in a Raspberry Pi 3 (ARMv8 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM vs. ARM A8 Single-Core 1 GB RAM in our BBB), the resources needed (memory and CPU load) for running these services are not negligible, even considering only data ingestion and delivery and not considering actual computation.…”
Section: Computational Load and Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other possibilities would be (i) to run pAElla on the DiG IoT devices as we do, and then use these distributed systems only for training and deployment of the ML models; or (ii) execute these stream services directly on the IoT devices. However, as shown in [67], which benchmarks them in a Raspberry Pi 3 (ARMv8 Quad-Core 1 GB RAM vs. ARM A8 Single-Core 1 GB RAM in our BBB), the resources needed (memory and CPU load) for running these services are not negligible, even considering only data ingestion and delivery and not considering actual computation.…”
Section: Computational Load and Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We used dockers buildx feature to create custom Apache Flink docker image for ARMv7 processor and hosted the image on DockerHub public repository 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing: Stream Processing Engines (SPEs) represent a good paradigm for Fog computing applications because of their extensive set of features, including support for event-driven, data pipeline, and data analytics applications. Constrained resources is also here an aspect to cater for; the literature includes surveys on how various SPEs perform in a fog environments [6], [7]. We decided to use Apache Flink 2 as our SPE of choice.…”
Section: B Platform Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These naïve methods also ignore throughput, latency and the sustainability feature of platforms. Similarly, [20] evaluates the throughput and latency metrics of platforms using the naïve method, which again ignores the maximum throughput and sustainability feature of platforms (Apache Flink, Apache Storm and Apache Spark) for resource constrained devices. In [21], [22], the performance metrics of Apache Storm were evaluated in various environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%