2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data fusion approach on confocal Raman microspectroscopy and electronic nose for quantitative evaluation of pesticide residue in tea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, E-nose has achieved excellent results in detecting citrus fruit Bactrocera dorsalis infection [32], garlic Alternariaembellisia infection [33], and pine mushroom Aspergillus niger infection [34]. In the quantitation of toxins, E-nose has been used to quantify aflatoxin B 1 and fumonisin in corn [35] and has been combined with Raman microspectroscopy to quantify pesticide residues in tea [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, E-nose has achieved excellent results in detecting citrus fruit Bactrocera dorsalis infection [32], garlic Alternariaembellisia infection [33], and pine mushroom Aspergillus niger infection [34]. In the quantitation of toxins, E-nose has been used to quantify aflatoxin B 1 and fumonisin in corn [35] and has been combined with Raman microspectroscopy to quantify pesticide residues in tea [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 215 ] Quantitative evaluation of pesiticide residue in tea Confocal Raman microspectroscopy; E-nose MLDF* PLS; SVM; ANN VIP; iPLS; rPLS; GA; CARS; SPA DF-individual model comparison MLDF > individual model; ANN> PLS/SVM e.d. [ 216 ] Quantify the composition of roasted and ground coffee NIR; TXRF LLDF; MLDF PLS SVPII -> PLS; GA -> PLS; OPS -> PLS DF-individual model comparison LLDF > MLDF; SVPII > GA/OPS e.d. + trueness, precision, linearity, working range [ 77 ] Predict total volatile basic nitrogen content in chicken meat Colorimetric sensor; optical sensor LLDF; MLDF PCA-BPANN ILA; LLA-(hyperspectral data); Pearson’s correlation coefficient based variable selection; Pearson correlation analysis MLDF > LLDF; removing uncorrelated data improved results e.d.…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the best method for the quantitative detection of pesticide residues in tea, Alireza Sanaeifar et al [ 41 ] applied electronic smelling and confocal Raman microspectroscopy for the detection of chlorpyrifos concentrations, with complementary data obtained using electronic smelling and confocal Raman microspectroscopy (CRM) sensing techniques. Based on the fact that tea leaves with different pesticide concentrations have different volatile compounds and that the responses generated by nanoelectronic smelling vary, various features of the nanoelectronic smelling sensor array were extracted and combined with partial least-squares (PLS), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) methods to build a suitable model system, with a total of 108 variables selected to construct the electronic smelling data vector.…”
Section: Analysis Of Plant-based Foods By Nanoelectronic Smellingmentioning
confidence: 99%