The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2019.2945240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data-Efficient Geometrically Inspired Polynomial Kernel for Robot Inverse Dynamic

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea motivating this choice is the following: the MP kernel allows capturing possible modes of the system that are polynomial functions in x, which are typical in mechanical systems [16], while the SE kernel models more complex behaviors not captured by the polynomial kernel.…”
Section: Squared Exponential (Se)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea motivating this choice is the following: the MP kernel allows capturing possible modes of the system that are polynomial functions in x, which are typical in mechanical systems [16], while the SE kernel models more complex behaviors not captured by the polynomial kernel.…”
Section: Squared Exponential (Se)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in this setting, it is possible to analytically compute the policy gradient from long-term predictions. However, as already mentioned in Section I, the Gaussian approximation performed in moment matching is also the cause of two main weaknesses: (i) The computation of the two moments has been performed assuming the use of SE kernels, which might lead to poor generalization properties in data that have not been seen during training [9], [10], [11], [12]. (ii) Moment matching allows modeling only unimodal distributions, which might be a too restrictive approximation of the real system behavior.…”
Section: B Gpr and One-step-ahead Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed speed-integration model learns only d x {2 GPs, each of which models the evolution of a distinct velocity component ∆ pi k q t , with i k P I 9 q . Then, the evolution of the position change, ∆ pi k q t , with i k P I q is computed according to (9) and the predicted change in velocity.…”
Section: A Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with the mean value µ θ (k + i + 1|k) and variance Σ θ (k + i + 1|k) calculations similar to (30). The difference between models (46) and (28) is that the former depends on the actual internal state α(k + i), while the latter uses the estimated internal stateα(k + i|k). Model 28is actually used for θ trajectory prediction through the MPC formulation.…”
Section: Control Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%