2021
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10509337.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data-driven, Probabilistic, Multiple Return Period Method of Flood Depth Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly given the paucity of updated scientific work on flood, few if any historical records of such estimates may exist to guide construction, protection, or restoration efforts. Thus, reliance on hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of flood events as a function of AEP is necessary (Mostafiz et al, 2021c ). However, relatively flood-safe areas often have “null” (i.e., zero or negative) depth values at modeled return periods, even while vulnerability remains substantial during the life span of the infrastructure (Mostafiz et al, 2021c ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not surprisingly given the paucity of updated scientific work on flood, few if any historical records of such estimates may exist to guide construction, protection, or restoration efforts. Thus, reliance on hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of flood events as a function of AEP is necessary (Mostafiz et al, 2021c ). However, relatively flood-safe areas often have “null” (i.e., zero or negative) depth values at modeled return periods, even while vulnerability remains substantial during the life span of the infrastructure (Mostafiz et al, 2021c ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overarching goal of this research is to characterize flood hazards at locations both inside and outside the SFHA. More specifically, the research addresses the question, “If no modeled flood data exist for some or all return periods, what are the flood characteristics?” To that end, this research introduces a method for describing flood hazards whereby the flood is characterized using the Gumbel extreme value distribution (Waylen and Woo, 1982 ; Nadarajah and Kotz, 2004 ; Al Assi et al, 2022b ), and flood elevations are projected at higher return periods (Mostafiz et al, 2021c ). The gaps in flood surfaces due to limited data are filled by spatial interpolation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site-specific u and α are corrected according to Mostafiz et al (2021) so that the u parameter at each cell overlying the structure is negative. The u value should be negative for most residential buildings, as flood depth at lower return period flood event would only be possible for waterlogged terrain.…”
Section: Characterizing Flood Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The building AAL (𝐴𝐴𝐿 ) is estimated using the method presented in Gnan (2021) and Gnan et al (2022a). Flood depths derived from Monte Carlo simulations (e.g., Brodie, 2013;Hennequin et al, 2018;Kind, 2014;Kind et al, 2020;Qi et al, 2013;Rahim et al, 2021Rahim et al, , 2022aRahman et al, 2002;Taghinezhad et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2013) with the fitted Gumbel extreme value distribution (e.g., Al Assi et al, 2022;Bhat et al, 2019;Gnan et al, 2022b;Kim & Lee, 2021;Manfreda et al, 2021;Mostafiz et al, 2021a;2022b;Rahim et al, 2022b;Singh et al, 2018) are translated to building loss percentages using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE; 2000) depth-damage function (DDF) designed for the home's attributes (e.g., onestory or two-or-more stories, with or without basement). The loss percentages are then multiplied by the structure replacement cost (i.e., building value, 𝐵𝑉), and the average of the resulting losses of all Monte Carlo-simulated flooding events is the AAL.…”
Section: Building Aalmentioning
confidence: 99%