2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data-driven modeling approach for the sustainable remediation of persistent arsenic (As) groundwater contamination in a fractured rock aquifer through a groundwater recirculation well (IEG-GCW®)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mobilization and reduction effects of TCE within the ROI of the GCW are also evident in the hydrochemical monitoring of the MLSW, where local rebound effects can be linked with the development of the recirculation cell that affects masses of contaminant accumulations or the influx of dissolved pollutants into the aquifer section intercepted by the virtual barrier. These findings are consistent with numerous literature studies conducted on recirculating systems at both laboratory and field scales, highlighting the mobilization of contaminants adsorbed or absorbed on low-permeability layers and rebound effects induced by groundwater circulation [86,87]. The long-term influx of a contamination plume from the source area becomes evident from the analysis of the temporal trends in TCE concentrations measured in the traditional monitoring wells installed within the site.…”
Section: Remediation Strategy Design and Decontamination Evidencesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mobilization and reduction effects of TCE within the ROI of the GCW are also evident in the hydrochemical monitoring of the MLSW, where local rebound effects can be linked with the development of the recirculation cell that affects masses of contaminant accumulations or the influx of dissolved pollutants into the aquifer section intercepted by the virtual barrier. These findings are consistent with numerous literature studies conducted on recirculating systems at both laboratory and field scales, highlighting the mobilization of contaminants adsorbed or absorbed on low-permeability layers and rebound effects induced by groundwater circulation [86,87]. The long-term influx of a contamination plume from the source area becomes evident from the analysis of the temporal trends in TCE concentrations measured in the traditional monitoring wells installed within the site.…”
Section: Remediation Strategy Design and Decontamination Evidencesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, GCWs can be utilized to deliver reagents and/or nutrients into aquifers, thereby enhancing in situ bioremediation and creating in situ hydro-bio-geo-chemical reactors for the degradation of chlorinated compounds [64][65][66][67]. These systems eliminate the water consumption associated with traditional physical extraction wells and mitigate the development of groundwater table depression cones associated with P&T/pump-and-stock (P&S) systems [68].…”
Section: Remediation Strategies For Groundwater Contaminated With Dna...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to low solubility, viscosity, and high density, the remediation of DNAPL contamination in the subsurface environment is quite challenging. Among all remediation techniques used for groundwater contamination, surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR) has been proven to be very effective in removing DNAPLs from aquifers [20,[39][40][41][42]. Pump and treat (PAT) technology is a traditional remediation method used for the treatment of groundwater contamination.…”
Section: Implementing the Surfactant-enhanced Aquifer Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%