2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data driven method for feature transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these approaches do not learn the variable deformation properties of body parts. The approach in [7] learns features and a part-based model sequentially but not jointly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches do not learn the variable deformation properties of body parts. The approach in [7] learns features and a part-based model sequentially but not jointly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image classification performance they report significantly lags modern SIFT-based models such as those described in [6], despite the fact that they learn a multi-layered feature representation. The power of learned patch-level features has also been demonstrated recently in [5, 9, 24]. Using mini-epitomes instead of image patches could also prove beneficial in their setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(4) as a similarity measure is popularly used in the applications such as document retrieval [23], image decomposition [19], image quality assessment [20] and feature transformation [24]. Mathematically, dot product is also called "cosine similarity" and is naturally tied to the popular variant of the k-means algorithms known as spherical k-means [25].…”
Section: Gradient Correlation Similarity (Gcs) Measurementioning
confidence: 99%