2021 3rd International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/hora52670.2021.9461377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data-Driven Fatigue Prediction using Recurrent Neural Networks

Abstract: Industrial revolution 4.0 has marked the era of advances in interaction among machines and humans and cultivate automation. However, manufacturing industries still have tasks which are labor intensive for humans with lots of repetitive actions. These actions along with other factors can cause the worker to be fatigued or exhausted. These in the long term can develop into work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD). Nevertheless, comprehending fatigue in a quantifiable and objective manner is yet an open prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high performance that machine learning models can reach, their real-life applicability remains limited if a comprehensive understanding of the underlying model self-arranged through the training algorithm is not extracted [55]. Consequently, despite their advantages, they have not been used in multilevel fatigue quantification approaches, being only included in binary fatigue prediction models (recurrent neural networks were used in [56]), mental fatigue (multilayer neural networks were applied in [57]), and drowsiness (convolutional neural networks were used in [58]) detection with accuracies around 70%, which is under the accuracy reached by other techniques [3]. Overcoming data and interpretability constraints, supervised learning models have been predominant for fatigue quantification models, with decision trees, support-vector machines and random forests being the most common [3,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high performance that machine learning models can reach, their real-life applicability remains limited if a comprehensive understanding of the underlying model self-arranged through the training algorithm is not extracted [55]. Consequently, despite their advantages, they have not been used in multilevel fatigue quantification approaches, being only included in binary fatigue prediction models (recurrent neural networks were used in [56]), mental fatigue (multilayer neural networks were applied in [57]), and drowsiness (convolutional neural networks were used in [58]) detection with accuracies around 70%, which is under the accuracy reached by other techniques [3]. Overcoming data and interpretability constraints, supervised learning models have been predominant for fatigue quantification models, with decision trees, support-vector machines and random forests being the most common [3,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology was similarly adopted in studies by Zhang et al, (2013), Baghdadi et al, (2018), and Kuschan and Krüger (2021), who also used SVM models for physical fatigue detection [41,42,43]. 2017) to conduct fatigue prediction for manual material handling tasks [44]. These studies collectively contribute to the development of a proactive approach to the continuous monitoring of operator's fatigue levels, with the potential to enhance work performance and mitigate the earlier-mentioned risks [45,46].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above studies are only some typical application cases. There are many successful application cases of RNN in the construction of the driving behavior recognition model [116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124]. It can be seen that RNN can be used for all kinds of driving behavior recognition, is suitable for highdimensional and big data sample learning, and can extract deep temporal and spatial features with an accuracy rate of more than 90%.…”
Section: Recurrent Neuralmentioning
confidence: 99%