2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data-Driven Automatic Tuning Method for MPC under Uncertainty using Constrained Bayesian Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constrained BO (CBO) has been demonstrated to efficiently tune also predictive controllers. The approach relies on efficiently finding parameters in model predictive control (MPC), such as optimal weights in the MPC cost, prediction horizon length, and even dynamic model parameters through BO, and tuning is done with respect to optimizing the performance of the system [33]- [35]. Applying BO to tune the MPC parameters according to specified performance indicators can also compensate for model mismatch, as demonstrated in [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constrained BO (CBO) has been demonstrated to efficiently tune also predictive controllers. The approach relies on efficiently finding parameters in model predictive control (MPC), such as optimal weights in the MPC cost, prediction horizon length, and even dynamic model parameters through BO, and tuning is done with respect to optimizing the performance of the system [33]- [35]. Applying BO to tune the MPC parameters according to specified performance indicators can also compensate for model mismatch, as demonstrated in [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying BO to tune the MPC parameters according to specified performance indicators can also compensate for model mismatch, as demonstrated in [36]. While parameters relevant to the safety have been included as constraints in a CBO tuning approach [33], [34], in the current work we extend it by including a penalization term in the cost for maintaining safety during normal operation, including changes of the system such as variable load or wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other derivative-free optimization algorithms, such as particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms, BO is considerably faster and more data-efficient (Lu et al, 2020). BO has been adopted in a few MPC tuning problems (Guzman et al, 2022; Lu et al, 2020; Piga et al, 2019; Sorourifar et al, 2021; Stróżecki et al, 2021) to attain higher overall closed-loop performance. A review of BO can be found in Shahriari et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian optimization (BO) 7,8 has emerged as a powerful approach for handling these types of black‐box problems, even when the measured objective value is corrupted by noise. Several recent works have successfully demonstrated BO for model learning and auto‐tuning of model predictive control (MPC) 5,9–11 and other complex control structures 12,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian optimization (BO) 7,8 has emerged as a powerful approach for handling these types of black-box problems, even when the measured objective value is corrupted by noise. Several recent works have successfully demonstrated BO for model learning and auto-tuning of model predictive control (MPC) 5,[9][10][11] and other complex control structures. 12,13 Standard BO approaches for auto-tuning rely on nonparametric Gaussian process (GP) models, 14 constructed from closed-loop simulation or experimental data, to describe the impact of controller tuning parameters on the closed-loop performance measures; these GP models can be interpreted as probabilistic "surrogate models" for the performance measures of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%