Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a data-driven model to predict credit risks of actors collaborating within a supply chain finance (SCF) network based on the analysis of their network attributes. This can support applying reverse factoring mechanisms in SCFs.Design/methodology/approachBased on network science, the network m… Show more
“…It is undeniable that scholars have paid attention to SCR focusing on logistics, but empirical research on SCFR focusing on capital flow is insufficient (Zhu et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2022). Although there lacks studies linking them together for empirical test, scholars often mention the possible impact of SCR on SCFR when conducting other relevant studies (Gelsomino et al, 2016;Fayyaz et al, 2020). SCR affects SCF activities and exacerbates SCFR (Jia et al, 2020), because SCR weakens solvency, leads to failure repayment, reduces credit level and impacts performance (Donnelly et al, 2014;Kouvelis and Zhao, 2018;Nguema et al, 2022), which are all factors that cause SCFR.…”
Section: Results Of Direct Effects and Multiple Mediation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results reflect the important role of customer integration in stabilizing sales collection ability and ensuring solvency. As Song et al (2020) and Yu et al (2021) stressed, customer integration helps SMEs to better understand customers' needs, obtain demand-side information, identify and reflect to market changes to reduce liquidity risks and mitigate SCFR (Wuttke et al, 2016;Fayyaz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Results Of Direct Effects and Multiple Mediation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there lacks studies linking them together for empirical test, scholars often mention the possible impact of SCR on SCFR when conducting other relevant studies (Gelsomino et al. , 2016; Fayyaz et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For prediction, Zhu et al (2019) analyzed the use of combining random subspaces and multiple boosting methods to improve the accuracy of credit risk prediction for listed SMEs. Fayyaz et al (2020) proposed a data-driven mathematical model to analyze the network attributes of cooperative enterprises in SCF networks and predict their credit risks. For mitigation, Wang et al (2019) proposed a model to mitigate SCFR based on the Internet of things.…”
“…proposed that SCR affects SCF activities and brings financing risks. For example, supplyside risks hinder the supply to other enterprises, causing interruptions and liquidity risks, thus result in failure repayment Fayyaz et al (2020). found that controllable demand-side risks guarantee SMEs to meet market demands and promote sales collection to strengthen financial capability and ensure solvency.…”
PurposeInformation asymmetry and poor solvency caused by uncertainties in supply chains are the root causes of supply chain financing risks (SCFR). The purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of supply chain integration on reducing SCFR by incorporating the mechanisms of information sharing and controlling supply chain risks (SCR).Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes hypothesis to discuss the impact of integration on SCFR and the mediating roles of alleviating information asymmetry and mitigating SCR, aiming at discovering factors and mechanisms to reduce SCFR. The research model was validated by applying structural equation modeling on survey data from 321 Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).FindingsIntegration significantly reduces SCFR by dual approaches of information sharing and mitigating SCR, confirming that alleviating information asymmetry to reach information transparency and controlling SCR to reduce uncertainties facilitate less SCFR.Research limitations/implicationsSMEs should enhance integration capability to reduce SCFR as it greatly influences the evaluation of financial service providers on SMEs and the sustainable financing capacity of SMEs. Additionally, any other methods that can improve information sharing and reduce SCR should be attached if possible.Originality/valueThis study represents a pioneering attempt to analyze the impact of integration on reducing SCFR by exploring the specific mechanisms of alleviating information asymmetry and mitigating SCR. Meanwhile, few prior empirical studies have highlighted the importance of SCFR.
“…It is undeniable that scholars have paid attention to SCR focusing on logistics, but empirical research on SCFR focusing on capital flow is insufficient (Zhu et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2022). Although there lacks studies linking them together for empirical test, scholars often mention the possible impact of SCR on SCFR when conducting other relevant studies (Gelsomino et al, 2016;Fayyaz et al, 2020). SCR affects SCF activities and exacerbates SCFR (Jia et al, 2020), because SCR weakens solvency, leads to failure repayment, reduces credit level and impacts performance (Donnelly et al, 2014;Kouvelis and Zhao, 2018;Nguema et al, 2022), which are all factors that cause SCFR.…”
Section: Results Of Direct Effects and Multiple Mediation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results reflect the important role of customer integration in stabilizing sales collection ability and ensuring solvency. As Song et al (2020) and Yu et al (2021) stressed, customer integration helps SMEs to better understand customers' needs, obtain demand-side information, identify and reflect to market changes to reduce liquidity risks and mitigate SCFR (Wuttke et al, 2016;Fayyaz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Results Of Direct Effects and Multiple Mediation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there lacks studies linking them together for empirical test, scholars often mention the possible impact of SCR on SCFR when conducting other relevant studies (Gelsomino et al. , 2016; Fayyaz et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For prediction, Zhu et al (2019) analyzed the use of combining random subspaces and multiple boosting methods to improve the accuracy of credit risk prediction for listed SMEs. Fayyaz et al (2020) proposed a data-driven mathematical model to analyze the network attributes of cooperative enterprises in SCF networks and predict their credit risks. For mitigation, Wang et al (2019) proposed a model to mitigate SCFR based on the Internet of things.…”
“…proposed that SCR affects SCF activities and brings financing risks. For example, supplyside risks hinder the supply to other enterprises, causing interruptions and liquidity risks, thus result in failure repayment Fayyaz et al (2020). found that controllable demand-side risks guarantee SMEs to meet market demands and promote sales collection to strengthen financial capability and ensure solvency.…”
PurposeInformation asymmetry and poor solvency caused by uncertainties in supply chains are the root causes of supply chain financing risks (SCFR). The purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of supply chain integration on reducing SCFR by incorporating the mechanisms of information sharing and controlling supply chain risks (SCR).Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes hypothesis to discuss the impact of integration on SCFR and the mediating roles of alleviating information asymmetry and mitigating SCR, aiming at discovering factors and mechanisms to reduce SCFR. The research model was validated by applying structural equation modeling on survey data from 321 Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).FindingsIntegration significantly reduces SCFR by dual approaches of information sharing and mitigating SCR, confirming that alleviating information asymmetry to reach information transparency and controlling SCR to reduce uncertainties facilitate less SCFR.Research limitations/implicationsSMEs should enhance integration capability to reduce SCFR as it greatly influences the evaluation of financial service providers on SMEs and the sustainable financing capacity of SMEs. Additionally, any other methods that can improve information sharing and reduce SCR should be attached if possible.Originality/valueThis study represents a pioneering attempt to analyze the impact of integration on reducing SCFR by exploring the specific mechanisms of alleviating information asymmetry and mitigating SCR. Meanwhile, few prior empirical studies have highlighted the importance of SCFR.
Over the last decade, supply chain finance (SCF) has gained popularity and increasing attention among academicians and stakeholders in the context of financial flows in the supply chain. However, some research gaps still exist that need to be explored to improve the sustainability of supply chains. Specifically, there is a critical research need to look at the conceptual background of SCF and its potential applicability in various phases of supply chains. Therefore, this article aims to bridge this gap by conducting a comprehensive State‐of‐the‐Art literature review based on 367 papers published from 2006 to 2020. Furthermore, this article is one of the first attempts to present current and past studies in the domain of SCF in a holistic manner. The analysis highlights the most influential authors, keywords, organisations, leading publications and clusters in existing research areas. This article also sets out a proposed research framework based on the triangulation approach perspective, that is, financial perspective, buyer perspective and supply chain‐oriented perspective. The most important and unique contribution of the article is the identification of new and emerging research areas where the application of SCF is still in the nascent stage. These findings can guide stakeholders at every stage of the value chain to appropriately use techniques that model policies to better inform investment and operational decisions in line with Sustainable Development Goals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.