2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21170-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data Analysis of Women’s Trails Among ICM Speakers

Abstract: The International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM), inaugurated in 1897, is the greatest effort of the mathematical community to strengthen international communication and connections across all mathematical fields. Meetings of the ICM have historically hosted some of the most prominent mathematicians of their time. Receiving an invitation to present a talk at an ICM signals the high international reputation of the recipient, and is akin to entering a 'hall of fame for mathematics'. Women mathematicians attend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of these tools has been studied, e.g., byGreiffenhagen (2014) andBarany and MacKenzie (2016) in the case of blackboards;Heintz (2000),Gerovitch (2016), andLane (2017) in the case of research seminars;Mihaljević et al (2016) andMihaljević and Roy (2019) in the case of publication patterns and keynote lectures; orMerz (1998) andMerz and Knorr-Cetina (1997) in the case of e-mail collaborations.2 For a discussion of various problems with Reichenbach's context distinction in philosophy of science, cf., e.g.,Hoyningen-Huene (1987),Schickore andSteinle (2006), andAmmon (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these tools has been studied, e.g., byGreiffenhagen (2014) andBarany and MacKenzie (2016) in the case of blackboards;Heintz (2000),Gerovitch (2016), andLane (2017) in the case of research seminars;Mihaljević et al (2016) andMihaljević and Roy (2019) in the case of publication patterns and keynote lectures; orMerz (1998) andMerz and Knorr-Cetina (1997) in the case of e-mail collaborations.2 For a discussion of various problems with Reichenbach's context distinction in philosophy of science, cf., e.g.,Hoyningen-Huene (1987),Schickore andSteinle (2006), andAmmon (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%